“marginally significant”

Likewise, students with clinical training were more likely to want to emigrate than pre-clinical students, although the difference was marginally significant (adjusted OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.00-2.49).

All significant or marginally significant interaction effects were decomposed with simple main effects comparisons and post hoc analyses with Bonferroni corrections.

There was a marginally significant difference for A3 at 12 months, but this difference disappeared at subsequent follow-up ( Figure 1 ).

( 5 ), ECOG performance score was the only prognostic factor and a marginally significant relationship was observed.

genotypes per infection where recombination was inferred) than in workers (0.07±0.05); this difference was marginally significant but only when assuming that queens should a prior i have more recombinants as the primary genotypes reside longer in queens than in workers (Mann-Whitney U, one-tailed P = 0.049).

PsyCt to FDCt) correlations This yielded a single marginally significant correlation, a little bit improved when the calculations were done for FD_ext by averaging the score for both the PsyCt and the FDCt ( Table 7 and Table 8 ).

In addition, individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis showed a marginally significant decreased risk of premature CAD adjusting for age, gender and BMI (OR = 0.690, 95% CI: 0.486–0.979, P dom = 0.038 and OR = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.520–0.994, P add = 0.046).

Factors with 0.05>p>0.001 are referred to as “marginally significant” in the following discussion to provide the reader with some insight into the weaker trends in the data.

The results of Table 5 show that there was a marginally significant interaction of GP88 with tumor size in DFS, but no hint of interaction between GP88 and any of the other indicators investigated, such as tumor grade, lymph node status, disease stage, PR expression, age, ethnicity and treatments.

The EPT children had significantly inferior performance to the term-born children across all assessments with continuous variables in t -tests, bootstrapped t -tests ( Supplementary Table 1 ), and in unadjusted wild bootstrapped regression analyses, except for SIPT bilateral motor coordination and NEPSY-II memory for designs, which were marginally significant ( Table 3 ).

Histologic type was marginally significant.

For all of these auxiliary analyses, the effect of subject-verb overlap remained significant or marginally significant in the same direction as reported above ( p s < 0.07 or smaller) and the interaction never reached significance ( p s > 0.8).

Including these participants in our analyses changed the results below slightly–the pattern did not change but the difference between status conditions became marginally significant.

A rejection region of p < 0.05 was used for all statistical tests but effects yielding p -values below 0.10 are mentioned as marginally significant effects.

One species (guppy) yielded a marginally significant result, and one species (zebrafish) was not significant (Table 1 ).

The interaction of probability and value is significant in Study 2 and marginally significant in Study 1.

The free speech samples revealed marginally significant variation in F0 with an increase prior to and a distinct drop during ovulation.

The P600 effect was marginally significant in Training 2 for this condition.

Growth of skeletal dimensions and mass Males reared and maintained on HI diets were larger in all traits (head width, tarsus length, body mass) across all ages, although the diet treatment effect for tarsus length was marginally significant ( Table 1 ).

Interactions between gender and APOE isoforms were also significant or marginally significant for these two conditions.

There was a marginally significant difference between males and females for living situation.

Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA indicates five characters as significantly discriminating between groups in a 2-clade solution using ML weighting and an additional three characters as marginally significant ( Table 4 ).

We found a marginally significant negative association between FeNO and the total score of asthma control test (not shown).

While the adjustment in time estimates during mind wandering appears to be insensitive to feedback valence, this difference was nonetheless marginally significant.

Therefore, we classified these genes as marginally significant.