The only marginally statistically significant sign was palpable lymph nodes, which were only present in the lymphoproliferative group (p = 0.07).
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
The lag time of 20 years for Detroit was marginally statistically significant (p-value=0.07).
The difference in the change for children aged 11 to 13 years and 14 to 16 years (17 minutes) was only marginally statistically significant, F (1, 1866) = 3.21; p = .07.
In comparison, the controls showed a small reduction that was marginally statistically significant, t (53.7) = −1.86, p = .07.
However, the HR for esophageal adenocarcinoma was only marginally statistically significant (adjusted HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.54-1.02, P = 0.07).
There was a marginally statistically significant different distribution of race/ethnicity by group, X 2 (2) = 5.3, p = 0.07, with more African American participants in the PWOA group than in the PWA group.
The difference was, however, marginally statistically significant ( p -value = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.96–2.83).
When looking across all celebrities, regardless of consensus level, there was also a negative association between mean loneliness scores and pairwise semantic similarity, but the effect was only marginally statistically significant in this case (i.e., it was attenuated by the addition of low-consensus celebrities; β = −0.03, SE = 0.02, t (914) = 1.45, p = 0.07, 95% CI = −0.07 to 0.01).
LVEF at the time of ICD implantation was lower in the PPCM group (median 18% vs 25%), but this was only marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.07).
Serum ALT levels [median (IQR)] were significantly lower in cases [16.0 (11.0–24.0), U/L] than controls [17.0 (11.0–25.0), U/L] ( P < .01), while serum ALP levels were higher in cases [79.0 (66.0–95.0), U/L] than in controls [76.0 (63.0–93.0), U/L] with the difference being marginally statistically significant ( P = .07) ( Table 1 ).
When partitioned by chromosomal location, X-linked loci also show significantly elevated diversity in African strains (17.30 × 10 -3 versus 8.15 × 10 -3 , P = 0.008, paired sign test), while the increase in African diversity at autosomal loci was only marginally statistically significant (17.79 × 10 -3 versus 9.39 × 10 -3 , P = 0.07, paired sign test).
PTSD+ participants experienced more improvement in pain from baseline to posttreatment than PTSD− participants by a small to moderate, marginally statistically significant amount ( d = .39, p = .07).
7 RESULTS The main analysis revealed only a marginally statistically significant interaction of context and condition, χ 2 ( df = 1) = 3.35, p = .07 as well as of time‐distance and context, χ 2 ( df = 1) = 3.32, p = .07.
Absolute increases of about 5% in being informed of transplant options were seen over study follow-up for all incident ESRD patients, although the trend was marginally statistically significant for LN-ESRD patients ( P = 0.07; Table 2 ).
Estimated D6D activity was unchanged ( P =0.79) while ELOVL5 activity was higher in MI ( P =0.04), and D5D activity was also higher in MI but only marginally statistically significant ( P =0.07).
For the overall sample, there was a marginally statistically significant association between low nuclear SMAD4 IHC levels and poorer survival of these patients (log-rank, P = 0.07) (data not shown).
The overall association between diagnosis at the time of admission to the ICU and respiratory virus positivity was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.07; Table 3 ).
A marginally statistically significant relationship was found between mean pursuit duration on the red triangle for random movies, F(19,3) = 2.79, p = 0.07.
In terms of the dependent variable, BMI, there were marginally statistically significant mean differences between the two groups at Fall Kindergarten ( p = 0.071) where movers had greater BMIs than non-movers.
The index was marginally statistically significant in Seattle (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.99; p = 0.071).
Also, the transverse temporal gyrus/primary auditory cortex (A1), part of the dorsal auditory stream was marginally statistically significant (MD, r = 0.132, p = 0.072).
Patients who started on ibrutinib had a higher risk to develop AF in comparison to acalabrutinib, although the difference was marginally statistically significant in a univariant model ( p ‐value = 0.073 as reported in Table 1 ).
Differences in adult care seeking location by region were marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.073); a higher proportion of households in the South (70.7 %) used public sector facilities as compared to in the North (52.9 %) and Central (47.8 %) regions.
Survival analysis showed that their association with prognosis was marginally statistically significant (log-rank test, P = .075; Cox regression, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.28–1.14]; Supplementary Figure S6b–c).
Winsorizing at the 95th and fifth percentiles yields a marginally statistically significant positive effect of our pooled treatment ( P = 0.075, see Table 6 , model 3) and a marginally statistically significant positive effect of the treatment with the largest regression-estimated effect—savings reminders (intervention 1), which delivered a weekly reminder to save to those who had not made a savings deposit in the prior week or, instead, a message offering congratulations to those who had (BH-adjusted P = 0.076, see Table 6 , model 4).