“marginally statistically significant”

This was followed by an upward trend (APC = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.3 to 8.2) during the financial crisis, with a 57% increase by 2016, from 1.8 to 2.8 per 1,000 live births, and finally, a marginally statistically significant improvement from 2016 to 2022 (APC = −2.6, 95% CI: −5.1 to −0.0) (p = 0.049).

While this split is in accordance with the known patterns of Y‐introgression between these populations (Matsudaira et al., 2018 ; Stevison & Kohn, 2009 ; Tosi et al., 2002 ), this PC is marginally statistically significant ( p = .049).

We found that Dbh-Cre; Vglut2 cKO mice only showed a marginally statistically significant increase in the SD1 of inspiratory duration ( T I ) (p = 0.0492).

Here, the only marginally statistically significant effect is the reduced P2 amplitude in the Foreign condition ( p = 0.05).

Even if mean PPD did not reach a statistically significant value, the results showed that mean CAL was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.05).

The Hp 2-1 genotype had 2.64 (1.0–7.08) higher odds of CAD than the Hp 1-1 genotype; however, this was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.05).

In the univariate analysis of baseline factors predicting the development of POAG in the LALES, the OR for POAG per 40 μm decrease in CCT was 1.16 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.50, p value=0.25), while in the multivariable analysis, adjusted for IOP, this association estimate became marginally statistically significant with an OR for POAG of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.70, p value=0.05).

The results indicated that the correlation between responses to the anticipation question and responses to the disappointment question was marginally statistically significant (r s = 0.26, p = .050, N = 59). 3.2 Experiment 2 We first excluded one participant who did not answer all test questions, and confirmed that no participants failed to respond correctly (i.e. “Paris”) to the attention check question.

Meta‐analysis of four RCTs ( N = 1425) in patients with rGERD showed a marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.05) increase in the symptom response rate when a TLESR inhibitor was added to PPI therapy compared to PPI therapy alone (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–1.00) [ 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ].

In eight of the 11 questions, a statistically significant difference was recorded at p<0.001 (questions 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11), and in the two marginally statistically significant differences, p = 0.05 (questions 4 and 10) were established.

Sex differences in knowledge were marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.05), while academic level showed no significant association.

This difference was marginally statistically significant in an independent sample t -test (t(4) = 2.7, p = 0.05).

The increased protein content of the larvae fed the MO diets led to a reduced amount of carbohydrates and more specifically, there was a decrease of 3.44 (no statistically significant at p > 0.05), 5.23 (marginally statistically significant at p ≅ 0.05), and 31.77% (statistically significant at p < 0.05) in samples MO10, MO25, and MO50 compared to sample MO0, respectively.

After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, gender, occupation, patient contact, and having young children in the household, we observed an increase in the odds of reporting unplanned absenteeism for each score increment in overall burnout scores, but the association was only marginally statistically significant: (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03, p = 0.05).

The indirect comparisons of efficacy between tofacitinib and control was marginally statistically significant at P < 0.05 in the NMA of all 16 trials and became significant after removing the 1 trial deemed high risk of bias.

However, in the multivariate analysis, only steroid use was found to be significantly associated with prevalent VFs (OR 0.121, 0.015–0.988), with lumbar BMD being marginally statistically significant ( P = .051).

The marginally statistically significant interaction between Device and Time (p = 0.052) suggests the difference in log(Flux) between Tropis and Needle/Syringe was not entirely consistent between 24 and 48 h.

However, one-way ANOVA revealed a marginally statistically significant difference ( p = 0.052) in Σ 4 NBFR concentrations in US food items from the three price groups.

However, although the orally treated group weight mean was consistently lower than that of the subcutaneous at every time point but at −127 dpi, the overall weight difference between both groups was only marginally statistically significant at 77 and 92 dpi ( p = 0.0527 and p = 0.0712, respectively) when the effects/lesion areas of infestation were more severe.

We found marginally statistically significant correlations ( r = 0.428; p = 0.053) between perceived feeling of human movement at the M cards in E-Prime PC administration (i.e., subjective ratings) and the M responses at the M Rorschach cards, in R-PAS standard administration.

The difference in the number of records reporting the conduct of SEMLS was different between 2012–2017 and 2018–2022; however, this difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

The difference between these three health cadres was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

In rat model testing, diabetic rats had marginally statistically significant elevated levels of global DNA hydroxymethylation compared to control rats ( p = 0.054).

The Network Comparison Test revealed a marginally statistically significant difference in global network structure ( M = 0.085, p = .054), but not strength ( S = 0.073, p = .067) across men and women.

Between-group comparison showed that PCSK7 levels were higher in the PCOS group compared to the control group, and this difference was marginally statistically significant (p = 0.054) ( Table 1 ).