The z‐scores tested against 0 (i.e., equivalent means of AV and A + V) showed a marginally statistically significant MSI effect, t (38) = −1.46, p = .076, BF10 = 0.46.
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
After different interventions, for disgusted expression, the napping group showed a marginally statistically significant improvement (MD=0.0394, 95% CI (0.0092, 0.0696), adjusted P =0.077), while the control group showed a non-significant improvement (MD=0.0241, 95% CI (−0.0039, 0.0521), adjusted P >0.05).
Screening colonoscopy volume declined more in the public hospital system compared to the private health system, with a marginally statistically significant difference in the extent of decline between two health care systems (p = 0.077).
Regarding chest CT scan findings, patients with unilateral right lung involvement were at increased risk of death (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 0.94–2.91) as compared with unilateral left lung involvement, although this increase was marginally statistically significant (P=0.078).
Lastly, for AO, 61.6% of women with low asset ownership reported delayed parenthood, while 22.6% with high asset ownership did so, though this result was also marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.078).
Differences in percentages between the two study times were statistically insignificant for men, χ 2 (1, N = 794) = 0.53, p = 0.467, whereas they were marginally statistically significant for women, χ 2 (1, N = 794) = 3.08, p = 0.079.
Across all groups, we found a positive but marginally statistically significant relationship between impact, measured by number of votes a node received, and degree centrality (rho = 0.151; p = 0.079).
Nymphal tick density also exhibits a marginally statistically significant interaction with fresh water, such that it increases when fresh water is farther away (β = 1.0001; P = 0.08).
As such, we consider marginally statistically significant the association between internet use and social relationship ( P =.08) and cultural activities dimensions ( P =.09).
A similar trend of greater healthcare cost reduction was observed among those who quit smoking and switched to ST in the SW cohort, but the difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.08), possibly due to the small number of patients in the ST cohort and reduction in statistical power after the introduction of covariates.
This is further supported by the ICE FALCON analyses which found that there was a marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.08) change in a woman's own PRS association after conditioning on her sister's PRS, and the sister's PRS association was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.07) in Model 3.
In patients with oral cavity CA, SGRT also showed a marginally statistically significant reduction in longitudinal errors (1.5 mm for tattoos vs. 0.2 mm for SGRT, p = 0.08).
We found a marginally statistically significant difference between mean scores measured at pre-test and midpoint: Mean scores increased by 0.150 units from pre-test to midpoint ( p = 0.081).
A marginally statistically significant Time effect was found for parenting nurturance [ B = −0.14, SE = 0.08, (CI 95%: −0.31/0.02), χ 2 = 2.96, p = 0.086], which tended to increase in both groups.
When considering both interactions together (MW and MZ), the change in explained variance in Flourishing is still relatively small (ΔR 2 = 0.0057), and the combined effect is only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.0874).
The moderation analysis also revealed a marginally statistically significant interaction between action plans and collaborative resources in relation to the fear of making mistakes ( t = −1.68, p = .09).
The association was marginally statistically significant in the subgroup within the second highest wealth quintile (aPR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.93–2.38; p = 0.095). 4.
The comparative improvements between the treatment and control groups were also marginally statistically significant for resilience ( P = 0.095) and perceived social support from family ( P = 0.074).
In the multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the correlation between the variables and retreatment, RV showed a marginally statistically significant association with retreatment prevention (odds ratio = 1.338, 95% CI = 0.971–0.993, p = 0.095).
Where initial results were, at least, marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.1), we applied a series of eliminations of rows and columns of the contingency tables, whilst re-running the significance test, to identify the levels of the two variables with which the pattern was associated.
The linear regression coefficient was marginally statistically significant when the 2012 ASIR prostate cancer data were used (p < 0.1).
Variables that either resulted in statistically significant odds ratios (ORs) ( p -value ≤ 0.05) or marginally statistically significant odds ratio (ORs) ( p -value < 0.10) to cater for probable within sample variations [ 25 , 26 ], or were found to be clinically relevant based on the literature, even if not found to be statistically significant, were considered for inclusion in the fully adjusted multivariable regression model [ 27 ].
There were statistically non-significant impacts of the parents-only treatment on learning, although with typical effect sizes ( d = 0.08, p = 0.158), and marginally statistically significant increases in child labor ( d = 0.11, p < 0.10).
Then, marginally statistically significant factors ( P < 0.1) were included in a multivariable mixed-effects model.
A p -value less than 0.05 ( p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant, 0.05 < ** p ≤ 0.1 was marginally statistically significant, and a p -value higher than 0.1 ( p > 0.1) was not statistically significant and indicated strong evidence for the null hypothesis. 5.