“marginally statistically significant”

There was a marginally statistically significant but not clinically relevant change in ACTH (0.4 pmol/L increase, P = .047) with a nonstatistically significant change in cortisol (Figure 3C ).

The Kruskal–Wallis test showed a marginally statistically significant difference between baseline (mean 3.8, 95% CI 3.5 to 4.0) and follow-up (3.4, 95% CI 3.1 to 3.6) for the SFS (χ 2 =3.9, p=0.047).

Hypertension was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.047).

Specifically in the multivariate model (Table 6 ), in relation to the faculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management, only the faculty of Engineering and Technology showed a marginally statistically significant effect in comparison with the other faculties (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.00 - 3.08, p = 0.047).

This difference is marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.0470).

The random coefficient model in which both the intercept and the effect of the linear predictor were allowed to vary across hospitals (Model 4) was found to provide a marginally statistically significant improvement in fit compared to the prior model in which only the intercept varied across hospitals (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 6.08 ( df = 2), P = 0.0478).

NRI was marginally statistically significant for MACE in the same study (p = 0.048). 4 Discussion We identified 20 studies that cumulatively provide strong evidence on associations between myocardial perfusion abnormalities and adverse outcomes in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Univariable analyses indicated that former alcohol consumers experienced a marginally statistically significant increase in AAC risk (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.00–1.99; p = 0.048).

Observed adherence to treatment differed from expected in all stages and groups, whereas the differences between groups were marginally statistically significant (p=0.048) only in the case of the 2011 guidelines (Group B differed from the others, exhibiting the lowest adherence percentage of −33%), while no differences between stages were observed in the case of the 2010 guidelines (p=0.0921).

Similarly, we also note marginally statistically significant differences after PSM in DMFS ( P = 0.048), DFS ( P = 0.048), and OS ( P = 0.025) favoring the MA-NSM group.

This test produced one marginally statistically significant result, identifying a biological process that contained 4 of the 24 differentially expressed genes in our data set (Panther overrepresentation test, p = 0.048).

When comparing the proportions between urban (47%) and regional pharmacies, the higher proportion in the regional areas did appear to be marginally statistically significant (rate ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2; p=0.048).The majority of pharmacies (73%) typically had at least two pharmacists in the pharmacy at any specific time.

In our predefined model, after adjusting for the same demographic covariates, a marginally statistically significant negative effect of AS on paroxetine Css was observed (exponentiated β = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.999, P = 0.048), which was not significant when further adjusting for daily dose.

On the other hand, there is a marginally statistically significant correlation between ease of performance and age (p = 0.048).

Pasture/hay land was not significantly associated with incidence in trivariate models, but demonstrated a marginally statistically significant negative association when included with total agricultural land (IRR, 0.918, P = .048).

The MK/S test was marginally statistically significant (p<0.048), but the results indicated that scores trended downwards only minimally (-0.002 slope coefficient).

Apart from geopolitical zone that was marginally statistically significant (p = 0∙0483) in the second wave, all the patients’ characteristics remained significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality in both waves in the adjusted model.

A marginally statistically significant relationship was observed between stroke occurrence and patients with a high HAS-BLED score ( p = 0.049).

S1 ), a decrease that, although small, was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.049) ( Supplemental Table S3 ).

Results showed a marginally statistically significant difference between RBLC and RBLC + NaOCl ( P = 0.049).

However, this association (adjusted hazard ratio 1.56) should be interpreted with caution, as it is marginally statistically significant (95% CI: 1.00–2.43, P = 0.049) and based on limited analytical data.

This is only marginally statistically significant at p = 0.049.

This was followed by an upward trend (APC = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.3 to 8.2) during the financial crisis, with a 57% increase by 2016, from 1.8 to 2.8 per 1,000 live births, and finally, a marginally statistically significant improvement from 2016 to 2022 (APC = −2.6, 95% CI: −5.1 to −0.0) (p = 0.049).

A comparison of LINE-1 methylation as a continuous variable yielded a marginally statistically significant association between decreasing LINE-1 methylation level and testicular cancer (OR per unit change = 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32; P = 0.049).

Difference between AST of D1 and D4 also showed a marginally statistically significant difference (p = 0.049).We analysed AST/ALT ratio D1 and D4 but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.711).