“meaningfully significant”

Cell viability in all 3 days and the presence of different concentrations of LPS (except for 50 μg/mL on day 1) indicated increased viability and cell proliferation compared to the control group, which was proportional to the increase in LPS concentration and meaningfully significant ( P = 0.00).

Because the ethnicity x language subgroups were so large, we set the criteria for meaningfully significant difference to be an absolute difference of ≥ 5 percentage points and chi-square p -value of < 0.001.

However, in three studied groups that were HHV-8 positive, a meaningfully significant difference was found regard to age groups ( P = 0.015, Table 2 ).

Because the very large racial and ethnic subgroups resulted in significant P -values for very small differences in prevalence, we made an a priori decision that to be considered meaningfully significant, differences between groups needed to be ≥ 1 percentage point and have a chi-square P -value < .05.

We include both levels of significance, as in some settings outcomes in studies that are meaningfully significant (i.e., p < 0.1) but that do not reach the statistical level of p < 0.05 are being presented as no different from controls, which is an incorrect conclusion (Wise et al. 2024 ).

Additionally, gender was not a meaningfully significant contributor for cancer risk in the MS cohort (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.98, 1.45, p = 0.27) ( Fig 2D ).

Developing a novel solvent extraction system that can be operated using low-concentration nitric acid is meaningfully significant.

Relative risks can be considered statistically significant if they do not include 1, but, if they do cross 1, may be considered meaningfully significant depending on the width of the confidence interval.

However, we do feel that it is still meaningfully significant given the ecologically relevant, classroom context.

Each of these showed meaningfully significant predictive power.

The heterogeneity in this estimate was 98.94%, which was also meaningfully significant.

Additionally, it was demonstrated that up to 20 cycles of UVGI treatment (approximately 1 J/cm 2 per cycle) do not exert a meaningfully significant effect on fit, airflow resistance, or particle penetration for the 15 FFR models tested.

Finally, the first three indicators were found to be meaningfully significant.

However, most other functional outcomes failed to reach a meaningfully significant difference compared to baseline at 2 and/or 6 months (eg, P-Flexion, L-Flexion, ODI).

This finding is novel and meaningfully significant.

The difference in QoL was most meaningfully significant in mental composite score among other parameters of QoL. solid organ transplantation quality of life adherence immunosuppressive medication liver transplantation Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 10.13039/501100006096 This research received no specific grant

It further changed some of the meaningfully significant results reported above.

Therefore, the evidence was inconclusive that this was a meaningfully significant association.

The same racial and ethnic differences were seen in the subset of adults who had an activated portal account by the end of 2020, but some of the meaningfully significant age-specific differences within racial and ethnic groups in the full population were nonsignificant among those with activated accounts ( Table 3 ).

( 86 ) and used the scaled A-measure values with a threshold of 0.71 for stochastic inequality making the difference between the two distributions meaningfully significant.

Finally, as mentioned, semi‐parametric bootstrap confidence intervals of the odds ratios were computed to assist in determining meaningfully significant predictors.

These differences are not small but meaningfully significant.

We made an a priori decision that a difference in prevalence between two subgroups (e.g., two levels of education, men, and women, or two racial/ethnic groups) would only be considered meaningfully significant if the aPR was statistically significant and the two age-standardized percentages differed by ≥ 1 percentage point.

Highest qualification One-way ANOVA test on teachers' qualifications and commitment demonstrated meaningfully significant differences at the 0.05 level for all commitments except for CT and its sub-dimensions of CS, and CSB.

The sensitivity analysis supports the lack of consistent and meaningfully significant associations.