“might not be significant”

Therefore, the impact of lost to follow-up on the conclusions might not be significant.

Other reasons these regressions might not be significant, even though the influence of the microclimate on the recovery of the biocrust was real [as suggested by Lázaro et al.

pylori was similar to that reported in a previous study ( 22 ), and the bias might not be significant.

Thus, the actual number of unnoticed cases might not be significant.

if the sample size for all categories is high, it might not be significant.

A rough guide to the interpretation of I 2 in the context of meta-analyses of randomized trials is as follows: 0%–40%: might not be significant; 30%–60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity, 50%–90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity, and 75%–100%: considerable heterogeneity.[ 14 ] RESULTS The literature search yielded a total of 211 studies.

In our study most of our patients were lean and were at low risk for the development of PPCs, that's why the difference in compliance might not be significant.

Even though the amount of nitrogen fixed by these bacteria might not be significant for the trees currently growing in the Scandinavian boreal forest, it could be significant in the longer term.

From the regression model and stratified analysis of older children, we hypothesized that the combined effect of atropine and OK would decrease as age increased and might not be significant in children older than 10.

According to Matson et al., who used anti-PD-1 on some patients and anti-CTLA-4 on others, "the downstream data conclusions did not change", so the choice of ICI therapy might not be significant [14] .

16 Therefore, the effect of the non‐differential bias might not be significant.

Therefore, given that CHU-9D is developed for children and has smaller CE, the observed differences might not be significant enough to justify switching to an instrument that uses adult-based valuation.

Hence, targeting isolated molecules might not be significant from a therapeutic point of view as the ‘extent’ of pathway impediment or suppression of tumor progression achievable by downregulating a single molecule is debatable.

In addition, the meta-regression analysis suggested that the publication year( P = 0.25) and bias risk( P = 0.61) might not be significant contributors to the heterogeneity.

27 In addition, several authors have pointed out that the effect on anterolateral rotatory instability might not be significant because the ALL acts mainly during knee flexion. 21 , 25 , 43 Nevertheless, recent clinical studies have shown that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction improves residual anterolateral rotational instability. 23 The pivot-shift mechanism can be explained by 2 factors.

Though, the difference was slightly lower, it might not be significant in clinical practice.

While co-infection prevalence might not be significant in the overall picture, the increasing trend for plausible co-infections between the SARS-CoV-2, Influenza viruses and RSV should not be overlooked.

The differences shown between S_xx and S_yy are fairly small and therefore might not be significant.

Considering that AR-JP patients represent only about 10–15% of the PD population, we believe that its influence on our overall results might not be significant.

98 , 101 Thus, for large fibers, electrostatic repulsion might not be significant and, thus, charged particles (having charges similar to that of the fibers) will have the same diffusivity as neutral particles.

rodentium -induced colitis, and thus the deficiencies in repair might not be significant in this model.

First, among the (S), content quality, software quality, and interactivity had significant positive effects on self-efficacy, whereas the effect of software quality on cognitive interest might not be significant but further investigation is warranted.

Based on these findings, we concluded that the potential bias arising from the increased use of warfarin might not be significant in our analysis.

The first consideration is about the age of rats; DrugMatrix used rats of 5–7 weeks while TG-GATEs used rats that were 6-weeks, which might not be significant but worth to mention.

Given that GWR is structurally different from multilevel modelling, the same variables might not be significant in both cases.