“mildly significant”

There was a mildly significant reduction in the median Z ‐score from T0 to T1 for weight ( p < .001), but not for height ( p = .034, not significant after applying the Bonferroni correction).

There was a mildly significant decrease in the prevalence of T13 over the years (p < 0.001, Fig. 1 a).

However, the decreasing negative effect of social functioning on patients undergoing OR had a mildly significant influence on the patients’ HRQoL as the inconvenience of daily life and complications improved 6 mo postoperatively ( P = 0.001) (Table 3 ).

Aetiology of disease on interaction analysis was mildly significant between age of enrolment and cirrhosis (HR 1.01, CI 1.00–1.02, p < 0.01), and HCV (HR 1.46, CI 1.08–1.97, p < 0.01).

Additionally, p-values of <0.1 are considered mildly significant and p-values of <0.01 were considered highly significant. 3 Results 3.1 Patient category Of the total of 76 patients, 35 patients had scaphocephalus, 34 patients had trigonocephalus and 8 patients had anterior plagiocephalus.

Relationship between warning signal variability and the degree of mimicry convergence We tested the relationship between local warning signal variation within species and the degree of mimetic convergence between species and found a mildly significant negative relationship ( p = 0.01308, d = 13 , R = −0.62) ( figure 2 ).

longbeachae was not significantly different from unstimulated cells (ANOVA, P > 0.05), but there was a mildly significant increase in elastase release by cells infected with WT L. longbeachae (ANOVA, P < 0.0153) ( Fig. 7B ; Fig.

A mildly significant difference was detected between B3 and B0 changes in B scores (Kruskal‒Wallis statistic = 20.93, P = 0.016) (Fig.

The temperature of the water affected the distribution of stages I and II negatively ( r = -0.69 and -0.72 at P = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively), and had a mildly significant positive effect on stages IV and V ( r = 0.58 and 0.57, P = 0.018 and 0.019, respectively).

Like tau‐PET, baseline CSF Aβ 42/40 demonstrated a mildly significant relationship with FDG–PET SUVR in subjects with MCI ( r = 0.137, p = 0.026), while no significant association found among CN ( r = 0.108, p = 0.294) and AD subjects ( r = −0.046, p = 0.750, Figure 4C ).

There was, however, a mildly significant difference in pre-intervention vs. post-IVI mean anxiety score change between the combined intervention cohort and control (p = 0.028).

Regression shows a significant effect of Sa o 2 on oximetric difference ( p < 0.001) and mildly significant trend for the categorical race ( p = 0.03) as well as their composite interaction term ( p = 0.047).

As mentioned above, the coefficient of a partner in the household on the borderline of statistical significance (and a strong effect of becoming self-employed with mildly significant p = 0.033) suggests a lower statistical power of FEM.

A mildly significant correlation was found between proliferation percentage determined by PCNA immunohistochemistry and mast cell degranulation (p = 0.033 and r = 0.601).

Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in the P1 and P2 components (non-significant differences for P2: U = 800.0, p = 0.16, and mildly significant differences with small effect size for P1: U = 51.0, p = 0.036, d = −0.3).

Although the effect remains significant and positive before and after COVID-19, the difference in the slope is mildly significant (≈0.02, z =2.06, P= .04; Table S11 in Multimedia Appendix 1 ).

On the 7 th postoperative day, mildly significant behaviour changes in the C group were observed compared to the VI group ( P =0.04), but by the 30 th postoperative day, the scores were comparable ( Table II and III ).

However, the difference observed between repellency indexes of male ticks exposed to DEET and ( E )-oct-2-enal was mildly significant (W = 1002.0, p = 0.041).

We found a 42% mildly significant increase of Panx-1 for Type II (IIA + IIX) fibres and a 36% increase in Type I fibres compared to the baseline ( Figure 4 A, p = 0.048 and p = 0.046, respectively).

Analysis of total arthropod abundance models showed that the effects of PC2 were mildly significant in July (r = -0.235, P = 0.049) (Table S9).

Also, a mildly significant increase of HSF1 ( P < 0.05) of 1.8-fold was observed.

The effect of ZING extract and SIM on glucose, insulin, HOMA IR, and leptin levels As shown in Tables 8 and 9 , it was observed that ZING extract decreased glucose level significantly ( p ≤ .05) by 21.66 % when administrated individually to HFD‐fed rats compared to HFD group, similarly HOMA IR mildly significantly decreased ( p ≤ .05) by 21.87% and leptin highly significantly decreased ( p ≤ .001) by 43.15% in HFD‐fed rats received ZING individually compared to the HFD‐fed rat group, and this effect increases by using ZING in combination with SIM, which showed the best results as significantly decreasing glucose ( p ≤ .01) by 33.33 %, highly significantly decreasing HOMA IR ( p ≤ .001) by 43.75 %, and highly significantly decreasing leptin ( p ≤ .001) by 49.58% when compared to HFD group.

14,15 In the comparison of MMSE scores between the presence and absence in persecution delusion, the mildly significant difference of MMSE scores was shown ( p < 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

Age was a mildly significant risk factor for increased ABI ( β = 0.13, p < 0.05).

The ∆ exoA strain displayed a mildly significant ( p < 0.05 cefsulodin and ampicillin, p < 0.0005 meropenem) increase in sensitivity to all three antibiotics compared with WT, as determined by a disk diffusion assay, but this does not fully explain the hypersensitivity of chvG or chvI deletion mutants ( Figure 6B ).