“moderately significant”

Statistical significance was interpreted as follows: p > 0.05, not significant; 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10, suggestive significance; 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, moderately significant; p ≤ 0.01, strongly significant; and p < 0.001, highly statistically significant.

The difference was considered significant if P < 0.05, moderately significant if P < 0.01, and highly significant if P < 0.001. 3.

Pearson’s correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant correlation between the knowledge test and attitude scale: r = 0.379, p < 0.01.

There was also a moderately significant correlation between hair cortisol and the number of behavioral issues reported ( r s = 0.494; p = 0.010).

Following administration of garlic extract to CP-treated group, the level of serum creatinine appeared significantly lowered (p < 0.001) in comparison with CP alone but still showing, a low significance increase for mothers and a moderately significant increase (p < 0.01) for their offspring if compared with the control group.

A moderately significant positive correlation was identified between negative reactions and secondary trauma ( r = 0.419, p < 0.01), occupational burnout ( r = 0.374, p < 0.01), and compassion fatigue total mean score ( r = 0.417, p < 0.01).

Likewise, a moderately significant positive relationship was found between perceived social support and PTG ( r = 0.38; p < 0.01).

There were 18 genes detected with moderately significant differences between the two cohorts ( p < 0.01 ** ): RGPD5, STXBP3, JADE1, CAPN2, GNAI2, RPL37, RN7SK, NACA, PMS1, FNBP4, PRRC2C, G3BP1, CREB1, SFMBT2, PAX7, SYNPO, UTRN, STK38 .

In correlation analyses, all variables are positively and moderately significant with each other ( r = 0.396–0.551, p < 0.01).

In both statistical analyses, the significance was set at three levels for descriptive purposes: slightly significant for p < 0.05 (green), moderately significant for p < 0.01 (yellow), and highly significant for p < 0.001 (orange). 3 Results and Discussion The section is organized presenting first the results for the AA phase followed by the findings in the TPH and steady SupplO 2 phases.

Colour intensity reflects statistical significance: deep pink for highly significant (p < 0.001), pink for moderately significant (p < 0.01), pale pink for marginally significant (p < 0.05), and grey for insufficient sample size to perform accurate analysis.

These changes were significant in % predicted VO 2 ( P < 0.05), moderately significant in VO 2peak , RER, VO 2AT , resting heart rate, and resting systolic blood pressure ( P < 0.01) and highly significant in VE peak , Max HR, % predicted HR, and exercise duration ( P < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

In the HF group (59 patients), PWV demonstrated a positive moderately significant correlation with creatinine ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01), RDW ( r = 0.31; p = 0.02); NT-proBNP ( r = 0.28; p = 0.049), brachial SP ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01), central SP ( r = 0.29; p = 0.02), and a negative moderately significant correlation with eGFR ( r = −0.40; p = 0.002) ( Figure 1 ).

In particular, ethanolic extracts presented the best performance compared to the other samples, with moderately significant differences relative to the cotyledons extracts of the same solvent ( p < 0.01).

When exploring subgroups (divided by mechanism of action), 5 trials of dopamine reuptake inhibitors did not show a significant effect on cognition, whereas 12 monoamine oxidase B (MAO‐B) inhibitor trials showed a moderately significant positive effect (SMD: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.90, P = 0.01; I 2 = 84%).

All five factors had moderately significant correlations with each other (γ = 0.195–0.534, P < 0.01).

Significant figures +Suggestive significance ( p value: >0.05<0.10) *Moderately significant ( p value:0.01-0.05) **Strongly significant ( p value <0.01).

[ 5 ] cephalometrically found in 25 Turkish Class III subjects moderately significant correlations between facial convexity and SNB (- 0.54, P < 0.01) in contrast to a not significant correlation in this study (- 0.31, P = 0.302).

85 out of 136 (63%) correlation coefficients ( N = 55185) were significantly positive, with 73 (54%) of the coefficients highly significant ( p < .001), 9 (7%) of those moderately significant ( p < .01), and 3 (2%) of those weakly significant ( p < .05).

The significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was chosen (slightly significant: p ≤ 0.05; moderately significant: p ≤ 0.01; highly significant: p ≤ 0.001). 3.

The results were moderately significant when p < 0.01, while these were considered highly significant when p < 0.001. 3.

Nonetheless, the GSH/GSSG ratio was positively impacted by the treatments containing extracts, with TS being moderately significant (** p < 0.01 vs. control group).

As reported in Table 2 , with elevated levels at 12 °C, SCFFAs (C2:0, C3:0, and C4:0) exhibited moderately significant effects ( p < 0.01–0.05), mostly in response to rT.

The summed chi-square values, for the test of genetic differentiation, were moderately significant for coxI sequences (0.001 < P < 0.01) and non-significant for cytb ( P > 0.05).

muricata juice alone or incombination with BV showed a low significant decrease ( P <0.05) in the serum-NFκB levels, while offspring of the BV-treated group showed a moderately significant decrease ( P <0.01) NFκB compared to the MNU-only group ( Figure 6B ).