“moderately significant”

However, we also consider p values between 0.01 and 0.005 as moderately significant, and we refer to 0.01<p < 0.05 as indicating a trend.

The P -values were grouped as indicating moderately significant difference (* P <0.05), significant (** P <0.01) and highly significant (*** P <0.001 and **** P <0.0001), indicating confidence values of 95%, 99% and 99.9%, respectively.

+ Suggestive significance 0.05< P < 0.10 * Moderately significant 0.01< P ≤ 0.05 ** Strongly significant P ≤0.01 Statistical software: The Statistical software namely SPSS 15.0, Medcalc 9.0.1, Stata 8.0 and Systat 8.0 were used for the analysis of the data and Microsoft word and Excel have been used to generate graphs, tables etc.

others shows only a moderately significant relationship for depression (F=6.711; df=1; p<0.05; Eta=0.247) and no significant relationship for anxiety (F=0.266; df=1; p=n.s.; Eta=0.051).

Therefore, we expected to have a fair amount of false negatives, and we additionally filtered out moderately significant biomarker activations ( P value <0.05) using one-way ANOVA-based analyses by computing Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) post hoc test from the non-significant candidates using the TukeyHSD test ( Table S1A ; Fig.

There was a moderately significant difference in spatial extent estimates by study type (p = 0.05), with a median spatial extent of 300 m in monitoring studies, versus 125 m in epidemiological studies and 400 m in dispersion modeling studies.

The studies were numbered 1? 2? 3, 4a and 4b, each containing one or Repriiits fi-on-i the 'NIJIC Lettkaemia 17iilt, Royal Postgraduate Atedical Sebool, London, W12 MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL two dozen patients, and when Studies 2, 3 and 4a, all of which involved a similar form of immunotherapy, were pooled, the apparent effects of immunotherapy on duration of first remission and on survival were moderately significant statistically (P<0.05).

Interestingly, RyR1 expression increased A fast to a value comparable with that of normal myotubes and only partially restored A slow , resulting in a moderately significant ( P < 0.05) increase in the relative contribution of A fast .

Several moderately significant SNPs using the optimal thresholds approach were found (all SNPs with p-value < 0.05, Table 5 ).

The two PAR instruments had moderately significant correlations ( p < .05) with each other and ITERs (Table 4 ).

The analysis revealed a positive and moderately significant relationship between Moral Maturity and the Conflict and Maladjustment (r = 0.66, p < 0.05) and Depression–Anxiety (r = 0.49, p < 0.05) sub-dimensions of the Adjustment to Divorce scale.

The only difference was observed for the significance levels—the NC study found the difference to be highly significant ( p = 0.0004) while our study found a moderately significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 level.

Based on p-value criteria, the correlation coefficient’s statistical significance is evaluated as follows: not significant at p > 0.10, moderately significant at p < 0.05, and highly significant at p < 0.01.

However, there was a moderately significant correlation between the duration of ABI use and BOT2—fine motor integration ( r = 0.43, p < .05), manual dexterity ( r = 0.53, p < .001), upper limb coordination ( r = 0.42, p < .05), and strength ( r = 0.58, p < .001).

The results stipulated non‐significant differences ( p > 0.05) for most of the structural indices, highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) for length index (LI), height index (HI), dactyl thorax index (DTI), index of compaction (IC), transverse index, compact index‐1 and compact index‐2, and moderately significant differences ( p < 0.05) for body index (BI) between the ages in the ewes.

There was a moderately significant decrease of 15.5% ( P < 0.05, Cohen's d = 2.33).

In the MAS, these analyses revealed a moderately significant negative correlation between R2* in the SNpc and FDOPA K i in the putamen (ρ Sp = −0.32; P < 0.05; K > 0.5), while in the SNpc this relationship was marginal (ρ Sp = −0.27; P < 0.10; K > 0).

Statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA revealed that compaction pressure had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) on EIIE , while MC and particle size showed moderately significant effects ( p < 0.05).

There was a moderately significant difference ( p < 0.05; Cohen's d: 0.234–0.412) between the participants' marital status, having children, losing relatives in the earthquake and EASTE total and subscale scores.

A moderately significant correlation ( r = 0.356, P < 0.05) was found between the grade of PFE (according to Falzi grading) and fracture grade (no fracture, isolated, multiple/comminuted).

The administration of diazepam and the APS extract at 400 mg/kg in our investigation entailed a moderately significant ( p < 0.05) quantity of head‐dipping and a delay in the initial head‐dipping compared to the control.

For women with an unknown educational level, we also observed a moderately significant higher use of non-hormonal LARCs as opposed to oral short-acting hormonal contraceptives (rrr = 2.62; p < 0.050) compared to women with primary or secondary education.

The association between area of residency (urban, semiurban, and rural) of pet owners and ESCCAP infection risk groups (A, B, C, and D) was moderately significant for dogs ( p < 0.05) (Table 3 ) but significant for cats ( p < 0.05) (Table 4 ).

A negative and moderately significant correlation was observed between CMJ and agility (p<0.05), but the correlation between DJ and agility was not significant (p>0.05).

Responsiveness The correlations of BBS scores and Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were moderately significant (ρ = 0.57, p < 0.05 and ρ = 0.42, p < 0.05, respectively) ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.