“moderately significant”

However, the HPCL samples exhibited significantly decreased levels of IL-17A (p < 0.05), IL-22 (p < 0.001), IL-23 (p < 0.01), and TGF-β (p < 0.05) with no significant change in IL-1β and a moderately significant increase in IL-6 levels (p < 0.05) compared with BVL patient group.

P values P values ≤ 0.001 were considered highly significant (***); P value ≤ 0.01 were considered moderately significant (**), and p values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant (*).

We observed a moderately significant correlation (Pearson's test) for the occipital ( r = 0.22, p < 0.05) and temporal ( r = 0.24, p < 0.05) rsEEG theta power density and the global SUVR by considering all SMC participants as a whole group (Figure 4A and B ).

Notably, the Evans index (EI), ventricular volume, and the composite score, derived from both ventricular volume and the EI, demonstrated a moderately significant correlation (p-value < 0.05).

As a considerable number of markers were determined, the level of significance was set at highly significant (p < 0.001) and moderately significant (0.001 < p <0.05).

Eight genes involved in the mTOR and EGFR signaling pathway which also showed significant difference in microarray from the control ranging from moderately significant to highly significant ( P -value < 0.05–0.000) were chosen for validating the microarray data.

P ≤ 0.001 considered as highly significant, P ≤ 0.01 considered as moderately significant, P ≤ 0.05 considered as significant with respect to disease control group.

Student’s t -test (two-tailed, independent) Where, Significant figures +Suggestive significance ( P value: 0.05 < P < 0.10) *Moderately significant ( P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) **Strongly significant ( P value: P ≤ 0.01) Statistical software The statistical software namely SPSS 15.0, Stata 8.0, MedCalc 9.0.1 and Systat 11.0 were used for the analysis of the data and Microsoft word and Excel have been used to generate graphs, tables etc.

The difference was considered as significant with P values of <0.1 to 0.05, moderately significant with P values of <0.05 to 0.01 and strongly significant with P value of <0.01. 7 – 10 Statistical software The statistical software, SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and R environment (version 2.11.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), were used for the analysis of the data.

This hatching rate was found to be moderately significant ( p < 0.05) and decreased while increasing the concentration of nanoparticles up to 150 μ g/mL.

However, we also consider p values between 0.01 and 0.005 as moderately significant, and we refer to 0.01<p < 0.05 as indicating a trend.

The results were interpreted at the level of P < 0.001 as highly significant, P < 0.01 as moderately significant, P < 0.05 as significant and P > 0.05 as insignificant.

After correction for multiple testing, 46 moderately significant (p<0.05) markers were detected on chromosomes 2, 3, 4 and 5 across all three phenotypes ( Figure 3 ; Table 1 ).

According to the Pearson correlation analysis a positive, moderately significant relationship between the EDE-Q total scores and anxiety scores was observed (r=.630, p<.05).

2 SNP haplotypes containing rs11564620 were moderately significant (p < 0.05) in US Whites (Additional file 3 Table S3, Additional file 4 Table S4).

The results were intimated as moderately significant ( P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01) and as highly significant ( ∗∗∗ P < 0.001). 3.

( 42 ) also observed a moderately significant correlation ( r = 409, p < 0.05) between the 30sCST and quadriceps muscle thickness.

Whereas up to a concentration of 80 μg/mL, the hatching rate was moderately significant (p < 0.05).

The degree of significant associations between the variables were presented as P < 0.001*** (highly significant), P < 0.01** (moderately significant) and P < 0.05* (significant).

The two PAR instruments had moderately significant correlations ( p < .05) with each other and ITERs (Table 4 ).

+ Suggestive significance 0.05< P < 0.10 * Moderately significant 0.01< P ≤ 0.05 ** Strongly significant P ≤0.01 Statistical software: The Statistical software namely SPSS 15.0, Medcalc 9.0.1, Stata 8.0 and Systat 8.0 were used for the analysis of the data and Microsoft word and Excel have been used to generate graphs, tables etc.

The P -values were grouped as indicating moderately significant difference (* P <0.05), significant (** P <0.01) and highly significant (*** P <0.001 and **** P <0.0001), indicating confidence values of 95%, 99% and 99.9%, respectively.

others shows only a moderately significant relationship for depression (F=6.711; df=1; p<0.05; Eta=0.247) and no significant relationship for anxiety (F=0.266; df=1; p=n.s.; Eta=0.051).

Interestingly, RyR1 expression increased A fast to a value comparable with that of normal myotubes and only partially restored A slow , resulting in a moderately significant ( P < 0.05) increase in the relative contribution of A fast .

After moderately significant genes ( p < 0.05) were removed, the overall effect of rare nonsynonymous allele load remained significant.