“nearly significant”

There is a nearly significant difference (Wilcoxon rank-sum test p = 0.05556) between the oligo with the HNF1 motif deleted compared to the intact, reference allele oligo; however, the oligo with the HNF1 motif deleted displayed high variance in activity ( Figure S6 A).

The drop in concentrations of procalcitonin in the UTI groups were nearly significant relative to no growth samples (p=0.0556).

A nearly significant signal between Zambia and Ethiopia (bootstrap p -value = .0558) was driven primarily by a single between-population cross (out of six; Supplementary Table S2 ).

In this analysis, the incidence of the composite outcomes among patients in the upper quartile subgroup showed a nearly significant increase compared to those in the lower quartile (16 patients [14%] vs. 7 [6.1%], respectively, p = 0.056), approaching statistical significance.

Natural rooting caused a nearly significant increase of C : P ratio (Control 252.25 ± 68.33, Rooting 271.70 ± 126.62, p = 0.056).

The association between PNPLA3 148M/M and FPR was nearly significant in patients with steatosis grade 2–3 including subjects with ultrasonographic estimation of steatosis severity (p = 0.056).

Interestingly, the three-way interaction between span, age-group and gender is nearly significant, F (1, 103) = 3.73, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.035.

Similarly, we found a significant difference between static and long updating trials [ t (72) = 2.94, P = 0.013, d = 0.73 (−0.33, 1.57)] and a nearly significant difference between short and long updating trials [ t (72) = 2.4, P = 0.056; d = 0.8 (0.03, 1.58)] in the 1.8 g condition.

Furthermore, the difference in average total symptoms reported by instructors on the firing line during JBC classes versus WPAFB classes was nearly significant ( p = 0.056).

Nevertheless, periodic consumption did not differ between the vegetation types, although it was nearly significant (Fig. 4 b, P = 0.056).

The MET surface density exhibited a nearly significant decrease of 1.2-fold ( p -value = 0.056) compared to resting cells. 2.2.

The exact binomial test resulted in a nearly significant trend between the test and control group ( x = 4, n = 8, p = 2/10; p-value = 0.056).

However, age in years showed nearly significant association with the scope of provided support ( P = 0.056).

A significant negative correlation was found between BPS and ALT ( p < 0.05), and there were nearly significant positive correlations of BPA with BMI and GGT ( p = 0.056 and p = 0.054, respectively).

Step time While there were no significant results for step time, a main effect of condition for step time variability was nearly significant (F(4,72) = 2.43, P = 0.056).

42.9%), nearly significant ( p = 0.056).

The decreased circulatory glutamine levels might be related to active glutaminolysis in EM patients. It is important to mention here that both the proline and glutamine levels have been estimated with respect to formate (as an internal reference), and possibly, this may have impacted the quantitative profiles of these metabolites, rendering a nearly significant change in the glutamine levels between the EM and NC groups ( p -value < 0.056, Figure 2 B).

The difference was nearly significant (p= 0.056) between mice who received isotype or anti-galectin-9.

The statistical analysis showed significant differences between supra- and submucosal plaque on implants for the genus Tannerella (p = 0.0067) and nearly significant differences for the genus Aggregatibacter (p = 0.056).

There was also a nearly significant interaction of Treatment × Time, F (3, 76) = 2.63, p = 0.056.

The effect of condition on the stiffness estimate K was nearly significant ( P = 0.056).

Also, higher day 1 kallistatin levels were independently associated with a decreased risk of death (odds ratio, 0.1) with a nearly significant statistical difference ( P = 0.056).

The β -diversity at weaning was significantly changed for the n6 group ( p = 0.028), while it was nearly significant for the n3 group ( p = 0.056) when compared to the SFA group.

GPA was found to have a nearly significant influence on PAL (Estimate = −17.280, SE = 8.413, t = −2.054, p -value = 0.056). 3.8 Mean weekday and weekend steps The analysis of mean weekday steps revealed a significant effect of learning environment type (Online: Estimate = 750.630, SE = 374.150, t = 2.006, p -value = 0.050), but the intercept was not significant (estimate = 5065.490, SE = 3550.890, t = 1.427, p -value = 0.172).

Elk’s F IS was significantly lower than VA (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 5.535e-05) but the post-hoc Dunn’s test was only nearly significant (p = 0.056; Fig. 2 b).