“nearly significant”

The covariates for these models were selected from the bivariate comparisons and included variables that were significant ( P < .05) or nearly significant ( P < .05 + 0.025) between the groups.

8.7%, respectively, p = 0.005), and after comparing patients with dyspnoea with patients with atypical angina the difference was nearly significant (27.9% vs. 13.6%, respectively, p = 0.05).

The covariates for these models were selected from the comorbidity and demographic data that were significant ( P < 0.05) or nearly significant ( P < 0.05 + 0.025) among the groups. 3.

In the study by Xie et al 60 which applied Lehman’s QOLI instrument, a nearly significant relationship ( P =0.05) was established.

As expected from the generalized deficit, there was a nearly significant group difference in no-adaptation thresholds across all orientations ( F 1,36 = 4.00, p = 0.05, Figure 2 B), with patients exhibiting worse performance.

In females there was a nearly significant positive association between MLGS and % food choice ( p = 0.05).

Plasma BDNF A nearly significant ( p = 0.05) change in the lithium group was observed in the concentration of BDNF at the end of the intervention (Supplementary Table 1 ).

Of the 24 comparisons, 12 had significant differences, 4 others were nearly significant ( p > 0.05, but < 0.068), and the remaining 8 comparisons were not significant.

There was a nearly significant difference in BC between pure USI with DAC group and pure USI without DAC[212(150,255) vs. 200(116.8,220), p = 0.05).

Correlations between specific students’ achievement and matching intrinsic motivation were positive and statistically significant for mathematics and reading (.17, and .25 respectively), but nearly significant for science (.15, p < .05).

Peptides significantly reduced skin roughness, with a nearly significant MD of −8.47 ( p = 0.05).

After controlling for task format, the group difference in discounting reached statistical significance ( F 1,51 = 3.70, p = 0.030, η p 2 = 0.068); the group difference was nearly significant when the two MA users who met criteria for cannabis dependence were excluded from analyses ( F 1,49 = 2.81, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.054).

A second linear regression model revealed that there was a nearly significant interaction between gender and SSI scores in predicting caregiving responsibilities ( β = -.58, p = .05).

The meta-analysis identified statistically significant reductions in hematoma ( P = .008) and a nearly significant reduction in risk of infection ( P = .05) and wound-healing issues ( P = .10).

The t test showed a nearly significant difference between the reversal ( M = 40.8 ms) and nonreversal ( M = 60.1 ms) conditions, t (19) = 2.09, p = .050.

Additionally, we observed a relationship between the frequency of the AA genotype and the development of N2 and a nearly significant relationship with the development of N3 of TNM staging with respect to N1 (adjusted OR = 3.39, 95 percent CI: 0.979-11.725, p = 0.05 and adjusted OR = 3.6, 95 percent CI: 0.97-13.357, p = 0.055, respectively).

When we compared the TNFi versus CS monotherapy groups among patients with any tumor type, we found a nearly significant higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.00-8.35, p=0.05) ( Figure 4A ) and a trend toward a significant higher risk of progression (HR 1.96, 95% CI: 0.94-4.08, p=0.07) ( Figure 4C ).

Compared to HC group, significant or nearly significant increased out‐DC were found in left BA4 ( T = 1.98, P = 0.050) (Figure 7C ), right BA4 ( T = 3.63, P < 0.001) (Figure 7D ), and motor network ( T = 1.90, P = 0.061) in MDD group, which were not correlated with HAMD total score or retardation score ( P > 0.05).

38 , 39 In our study, we observed a nearly significant association ( p = 0.05) between time between initial event and HR-MRI and the prevalence of VW lesions, suggesting that some lesions might have resolved at the time of scanning, though caution is needed in interpretation.

Analysis of sleep efficiency data revealed an interaction effect between night and light intervention group that was nearly significant ( F (4, 124) = 2.44, p =0.050, η p 2 = 0.073).

Lastly, a nearly significant difference (p=0.05) was seen in the reports of modest weight gain: two (3%) trazodone users, five (9%) doxepin users, and none of the melatonin users, as illustrated in Figure 1 .

After 3 months, all four research groups showed nearly significant ( p < 0.05) reductions in the periodontal parameters, within the D.AV group which, the GI showed nonsignificant ( p > 0.05) results.

In the SELECT study, a nearly significant OS prolongation was observed after adjustment (HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.40–1.00, P = 0.05).

For younger ages, the trend is nearly significant at p<0.05, with an increasing trend; for older ages, the trend is clearly decreasing.

The summary MD was nearly significant between the two groups (MD = −1.71, 95% CI: −3.45 to 0.03, P =0.05, Figure 4 ), with substantial heterogeneity among studies (chi 2 = 26.44, P < 0.0001, I 2 = 81%, Figure 4 ).