Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,350 sentences · 3,350 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
es aged 60 to 69, there was a significant negative correlation (rho = -0.345, p = 0.031) between P300 latency and DHEA levels; (4) in females aged 50 to 59, IGFBP-3 was significantly (rho = -0.239, p = 0.040) negatively associated with prolonged P300 latency; (5) In females aged 40 to 69, there was nearly significant (rho = -0.170, p = 0.050) negative correlation between DHEA levels and P300 latency.
nearly significantp = .051.0× alphagold
For all three time periods, before-after decreases in hospitalization rates were significant for TNH patients, while before-after increases were insignificant for CNH patients; differences in the before-after trend for TNH relative to CNH patients, after adjusting for other hospitalization risk factors, were either significant or nearly significant at p = .05.
nearly significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
In addition, HH required more CRRT (OR = 4.19; 95 % CI, 3.02–5.82; P < 0.00001) 10 , 16 , 17 , time to ROSC (MD = 5.0 min; 95 % CI, 3.02–6.97; P < 0.00001) 10 , 11 , 16 , 17 , 18 but a nearly significant difference in mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.40; 95 % CI, 1.00–1.97; P = 0.05) 10 , 11 , 17 ( Fig. 3 , Fig. 4 , Fig. 5 ).
nearly significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
(2000) reported ORs consistently greater than unity and a nearly significant ( p = 0.05) trend for maternal exposure to insecticides during pregnancy, and significant ORs for childhood exposure to pesticides (OR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4–4.0) and professional pest extermination around the home during pregnancy (OR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4–6.2).
nearly significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Additionally, we observed a relationship between the frequency of the AA genotype and the development of N2 and a nearly significant relationship with the development of N3 of TNM staging with respect to N1 (adjusted OR = 3.39, 95 percent CI: 0.979-11.725, p = 0.05 and adjusted OR = 3.6, 95 percent CI: 0.97-13.357, p = 0.055, respectively).
nearly significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
Interestingly, however, when performing analysis separately for each spinal level (e.g., middle 3 slices for each spinal level) the authors reported a significant increase in MF CSA at L3, L4 and L5 in the general strength and conditioning group at 6-months, and a significant decrease in MF CSA at L1 in the motor control group at 3-months, which was nearly significant ( P = 0.05) at L2 as well.