The association between PHN and the ABCC4 gene, for which the rs4773840 SNP was significantly associated with the phenotype, was only marginally significant in our gene-based analysis (adjusted p = 0.06364; Supplementary Table S2, Figure 3(b) ).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Postoperative gut microbiota abundances were different between the participants with and without postoperative delirium Our analysis revealed that participants who developed postoperative delirium had higher Parabacteroides distasonis in their postoperative gut microbiota (average abundance 1.659 ± 0.984) compared to those who did not develop delirium (average abundance 0.850 ± 1.080) although, this difference was only marginally significant (Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.064, Fig. 2A ).
The interaction between digital literacy and the older group was positive and significant (B = 0.296, p = 0.033), and the interaction with the middle-aged group was also positive, though only marginally significant (B = 0.190, p = 0.064).
Although the Cueing × Group interaction was only marginally significant, F (1, 33) = 3.67, p = 0.064 1 , a further analysis indicated that only the control group showed a significant IOR effect, F (1, 14) = 62.41; p < 0.001.
4b, e ), although there was a numerically similar but only marginally significant effect in the hippocampus ( t 34 = 1.560, P = 0.064).
Similarly, functional genes explained 47% of variance in CO 2 flux, although the overall gene matrix term was only marginally significant ( P = .064, Table S9 ).
However, these differences were overall only marginally significant ( p = 0.064).
The interaction between coherence and offset was only marginally significant ( B = − 0.009; SE = 0.005; t (26718) = −1.86; P = 0.064), with a slightly stronger effect of offset for high coherence relative to low coherence trials.
This association too was only marginally significant (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.97 - 3.27, p = 0.064).
The overall regression model on RMETNeut was only marginally significant and accounted for 10% of the variance (F(7,119) = 1.98; p = 0.064).
When coded relative to parents’ language dominance, parents reported switching from their non-dominant to dominant language ( M = 2.10, SD = 1.83) more often than from their dominant to non-dominant language ( M = 1.93, SD = 1.81), although this difference was small and only marginally significant, t (367) = 1.86, p = 0.064, d = 0.09.
After adjusting for relevant covariates (age, sex, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index, unknown source of SAB, site of SAB acquisition, MRSA, ICU admission, and ID consult), the association of p-SAB with six-month mortality was similar in magnitude but only marginally significant (HR = 1.93, 95% = CI 0.96–3.87, p = 0.064).
However, the difference between 5‐ and 6‐year‐olds and 4‐year‐olds was only marginally significant, p = 0.064.
However, the association between walking frequency and sleep-score changes was only marginally significant ( p = 0.064) and walking duration emerged as a significant predictor ( p = 0.012) among 3 walking parameters ( Table 3 ). 4.
11 Also, government jobs appear to make households more food secure than having own businesses; however, the difference between the estimated coefficients is only marginally significant in column 1 (F-test: p = 0.064 in column 1 but p > 0.10 in subsequent columns).
However, the differences in pain severity scores were not statistically significant ( p = 0.251), whereas the differences in depression scores were only marginally significant ( p = 0.064).
363.6 ± 11.8 min); however, the difference was only marginally significant (P = 0.064).
However, the interaction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.064).
These results suggest that the main driver for decoupling from the sensorimotor cortex may be time since amputation, whereas coupling with the DMN depends on both dissociation from the network of origin and increased phantom pain, although the contribution of phantom pain to the final model was only marginally significant (t = 2.00, p = 0.064), and should therefore be interpreted with caution.
While the mean scores displayed in Fig 3 suggest that the male participants drive this effect, statistical analyses did not confirm this revealing an only marginally significant effect for the 3-way interaction ( F (1,134) = 3.49, p = .064).
Although this difference was only marginally significant ( P = .064), the greater ease of calculation and stronger predictive ability of ΔSI support its role as a more practical parameter for clinical application.
In adults with and without ADHD however, this CDA amplitude enhancement was only marginally significant (Trial-type effect: F(1,31) = 3.7; P = .064).
Studies that incorporated postural hygiene in addition to exercise obtained better results than those that focused only on postural hygiene, although the difference between them was only marginally significant ( p = 0.064).
In addition, a higher proportion of B cells (CD19, Fig 1C ) was also found, however this result was only marginally significant (P = 0.064).
The correlation was moderate but only marginally significant, r = 0.412, t (19) = 1.970, p = 0.064.