“only marginally significant”

ciliata , estimated mean dispersal distances ranged between δ = 0.23 and 0.71 m ( Table 2 ), although differences were only marginally significant ( χ 2 4 d.f. = 8.846, p = 0.065).

Note that we applied the step-wise analysis even though CC in Epoch 10 (28 ms) was only marginally significant, t (44) = −1.54, p = .065, d = 0.23.

On the other hand, we observed that TEs with PCH interactions tend to be closer to genes than TEs without such interactions, although the analysis is only marginally significant ( Mann-Whitney U test , p = 0.065).

Our present study shows similar T allele frequencies among cohorts and only marginally significant differences (p = 0.065) have been observed between the UC and HC groups.

However, this effect was attenuated and only marginally significant in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.002, p = 0.066).

Using a GLM with normal errors (see ‘Methods’), we found that copulation duration was not different between dominant and submissive males, and the only marginally significant variable was temperature, which had a negative effect (estimate = −0.039 ± 0.020, p = 0.066; Table S2 ).

Additionally the effect of Type was only marginally significant ( df = 47395, P = 0.066) on 1500 Hz stimuli.

However, both effects were only marginally significant (both p values = .066).

In AG if two people showed similar neural patterns in the encoding residual, they were also more likely to tell similar stories (Mean ρ = 0.052, SD = 0.052, z = 2.84, p = 0.004, q = 0.011); The same effect was found in mPFC, but it was only marginally significant (Mean ρ = 0.032, SD = 0.102, z = 1.83, p = 0.066, q = 0.099).

The self-rated rational ability was only marginally significant as a predictor (β = -.15, p = .066).

Differences in protein depolymerisation rates among plant species were, however, only marginally significant (F 5,24 = 2.41, p = 0.066), if values were calculated per area, considering differences in bulk density and organic horizon depth, and did not show clear moss-shrub contrasts anymore (Table S2).

We computed the differences between the observed and optimal outcomes (mean reward when following the ideal allocator) and observed a negative deviation from optimality (mean ± s.d.: –.56 ± 1.30), which was only marginally significant ( t 19 = –1.95, p = .066).

The occupancy model, which separates detection probability from true occupancy, revealed a strong negative effect of road distance on occupancy (coefficient = -0.5897, SE = 0.0655, P< 0.0001), while the detection covariate (accessibility) was only marginally significant (P = 0.066) ( Supplementary Material S2 , Supplementary Table 2A ).

Overall, a positive profit margin was associated with a higher probability of any PPE shortages, but the association was only marginally significant (marginal effect = −0.9%, P = .066).

post‐MELD survival was only marginally significant (p = 0.066 and p = 0.063; respectively), better short, medium and long‐term post‐LT survival were observed in the post‐MELD period.

As noted in Table 3 , the addition of the type of bereavement (accident, military, terror attack, illness, and other), time since the bereavement, gender, and age as covariates incurred one change in the pattern of results: the significant effect of stress on the likelihood of substance use disorder ( p = .036) became only marginally significant ( p = .066).

This correlation was only marginally significant in the ND group ( P =0.066, ANOVA) and absent in the HFD group ( P =0.510, ANOVA).

This result is confirmed by our data, which shows that both the proportion of grasses and SOC tend to increase in more intensive systems compared to less intensive systems, although the relationship is relatively weak (r = 0.280) and only marginally significant ( p = 0.066).

An ANOVA on DU from the speech production task found a significant naming condition effect [ F (1,24) = 344.09, P < 0.001] and interaction effect between condition and group [ F (1,24) = 6.86, P = 0.015], whereas the group main effect was only marginally significant [ F (1,24) = 3.72, P = 0.066].

The improvement of the model fit due to the inclusion of the quadratic term was not significant for the verbal Stroop effect (Δ F (1,284) = 1.95, corrected p = 0.327) and only marginally significant for the spatial one (Δ F (1,284) = 4.57, corrected p = 0.066), but the increase in R 2 was negligible in both cases (respectively, <0.01 and 0.02).

Amplitude of aware errors was also significantly greater than hits, but only for the left OFC (left OFC1: t(13) = 2.53, p = .025 left OFC2: t(13) = 2.47, p = .028), whereas the right OFC was only marginally significant (right OFC1: t(13) = 2.0, p = .066; right OFC2: t(13) = 2.09, p = .057).

Satisfaction with informal informational and appraisal support, were only marginally significant ( p = 0.066 and 0.068) and underpowered (power = 0.41– 0.48).

In contrast to study 1, model II shows a strong bur only marginally significant positive interaction effect between students’ level of burnout and the shades of bribery (burnout × grey: β II = 0.335, p = 0.066; burnout × black: β II = 0.297, p = 0.089).

This result was, however, only marginally significant ( b = −0.36, p = 0.066).

The rate of intraoperative RD was observed in only three cases of ERM, and this result was only marginally significant ( p = 0.066) Patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months (range 6–48 months).