For example, dACC activation in the expectancy of an adult picture > fixation contrast, which was significant in Study 1, was only marginally significant (p = 0.066) in Study 2 ( Fig. 5 B).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Results obtained from this analysis pipeline were found well in line with those obtained with h ranging from 1.05 to 1.5, with the exception that the difference in fractal BLP between HC and SZ over C3 was found only marginally significant ( p = .0663, corrected, AP = 0.3158, ES = 1.0469).
Although the uncovered plants exhibited a notably higher mortality rate, Fisher’s Exact Test indicated that this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.0664).
Only in the younger group did the mean pattern score of the load-related pattern also contribute to task performance; in the older group, significance of this association was only marginally significant with p = 0.0665 (We performed corresponding linear regressions to predict mean reaction time in both age groups but did not find any associations with the load-related patterns in either age group and elected to omit the table listing for clarity.).
A similar trend was found for late instar nymphs (upper nodes: 0.26±0.08 mm 2 , n = 8; lower nodes: 0.20±0.06 mm 2 , n = 11) but differences were only marginally significant ( F 1, 17 = 3.85; P = 0.0665).
The score of depression during the quarantine was higher than the score after the quarantine, but the p -value is only marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
Local-scale dispersion (proportion of plots occupied per site) correlated positively with seed mass for introduced but not native taxa, although this difference was only marginally significant (seed mass × origin: p = 0.067; Figure 2 A, Table S1 ).
The split-sample models also were consistent with those reported above, but it is important to note the impact of 5-HTTLPR was only marginally significant for the pre-9/11 cases in the rare-events logistic regression model ( n = 632, b = 1.170, standard error for b = .638, z = 1.83, p = .067).
OD = 0.99 ± 0.08, n = 12) ( Figure 3 a,b), but the difference is only marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
Gaze samples away proportions (GSP) GSP was higher in the arithmetic task ( M = 0.093 SD = 0.08) than in the naming task ( M = 0.065, SD = 0.046), but this trend was only marginally significant ( t (19) = 1.948, p = 0.067, Cohen's d = 0.422).
However, this was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.155, Δ R 2 = 0.066, Δ F (2, 72) = 2.809, p = 0.067; therefore, the effect was not explored further. 3.2.2.
Decreasing Ccr showed an adverse effect in univariate analysis (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.22–3.77 P = 0.008), but this association was only marginally significant in multivariate analysis with adjusted HR 1.90 (95% CI 0.96–3.77, P = 0.067) (Table 2 ).
However, the difference was only marginally significant (χ 2 (1, 124) = 3.35, p = 0.067).
Based on the bacterial family distribution, we observed that seasons (ANOSIM: R = 0.33, p = 0.001) and urban vs rural localities (ANOSIM: R = 0.39, p = 0.001) had a significant impact on the microbiota composition, while the effect of species was only marginally significant (ANOSIM: R = 0.08, p = 0.067).
The model including the interaction with run (AIC = 27,982.9) slightly outperformed the equivalent model without this interaction (AIC = 27,984.2), but the decreasing influence of changepoint probability on hit rate as the experiment progressed was only marginally significant (log-odds = 0.01, CI = −0.00–0.03, z = 1.83, p = 0.067).
The interaction of voltage and pulse width was an influential factor for μ max , however only marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
This proportion, although only marginally significant ( P = 0.067, hypergeometric test; Fig. 5B ), indicated that the gene embeddings indeed could be used to identify more disease-associated genes.
A 2 (group: control, patient) by 2 (spatial cue: PSS, PSC) ANOVA showed that the main effect of group was significant (F 1,66 = 11.751, p = 0.001), the main effect of spatial condition was only marginally significant (F 1,66 = 3.472, p < 0.067), and the interaction between group and spatial condition was not significant (F 1,66 = 0.323, p = 0.571).
About 33% of the respondents working at referral hospitals (26 replies, Clusters 1 and 2) proposed “breathless and sweaty” exercise, but the difference between clusters was only marginally significant (χ 2 =11.797, p =0.067).
Analysis of 33 of these farmers for which we had data on future behaviour showed a similar result though only marginally significant ( p = .067).
As can be seen in Figure 2 , a majority of children (18) showed improvements in their SIPC scores from pre- to post-intervention, although the effect was only marginally significant [ t (30) = -1.903, p = 0.067, effect size r : 0.333, Cohen’s d : -0.706].
cal comparisons across the I, M, and L conditions were very similar to those observed in Experiments 1–2 and were significant (pointing error was higher in the M condition than in the other conditions, t s (23) > 2.32, p s < 0.029), the interaction between learning-imagined and initial-imagined was only marginally significant ( F (1,23) = 3.69, MSE = 150.86, p = 0.067, η 2 = 0.14).
In this study, abundance of only Bifidobacterium tended to be lower in CD than in HC, although this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.067) [ 86 ].
However, the slope for CR and AL was only marginally significant at levels of externalizing one SD above the mean ( b = 0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.067) and not significant at low levels of externalizing behaviors ( b = 0.05, SE = 0.06, p = 0.42).
Task effects in adults While there was a substantial change in RT across the three tasks, increasing from 1660 ms for the Butterfly task to 1760 ms for the Identity task and 1900 ms for the Expression task, the main effect of task on RT was only marginally significant [ F (2,48) = 2.9, p = 0.067].