Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,073 sentences · 5,073 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp = 0.06651.3× alphagold
Only in the younger group did the mean pattern score of the load-related pattern also contribute to task performance; in the older group, significance of this association was only marginally significant with p = 0.0665 (We performed corresponding linear regressions to predict mean reaction time in both age groups but did not find any associations with the load-related patterns in either age group and elected to omit the table listing for clarity.).
only marginally significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
Based on the bacterial family distribution, we observed that seasons (ANOSIM: R = 0.33, p = 0.001) and urban vs rural localities (ANOSIM: R = 0.39, p = 0.001) had a significant impact on the microbiota composition, while the effect of species was only marginally significant (ANOSIM: R = 0.08, p = 0.067).
only marginally significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
The model including the interaction with run (AIC = 27,982.9) slightly outperformed the equivalent model without this interaction (AIC = 27,984.2), but the decreasing influence of changepoint probability on hit rate as the experiment progressed was only marginally significant (log-odds = 0.01, CI = −0.00–0.03, z = 1.83, p = 0.067).
only marginally significantp < 0.0671.3× alphagold
A 2 (group: control, patient) by 2 (spatial cue: PSS, PSC) ANOVA showed that the main effect of group was significant (F 1,66 = 11.751, p = 0.001), the main effect of spatial condition was only marginally significant (F 1,66 = 3.472, p < 0.067), and the interaction between group and spatial condition was not significant (F 1,66 = 0.323, p = 0.571).
only marginally significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
cal comparisons across the I, M, and L conditions were very similar to those observed in Experiments 1–2 and were significant (pointing error was higher in the M condition than in the other conditions, t s (23) > 2.32, p s < 0.029), the interaction between learning-imagined and initial-imagined was only marginally significant ( F (1,23) = 3.69, MSE = 150.86, p = 0.067, η 2 = 0.14).