“only marginally significant”

At the subadult stage, sex was only marginally significant (0.41 ± 0.22, t 11 = 1.85, p = 0.07).

Kruskal–Wallis tests showed group differences in anger ( p = .02), disgust ( p = .002), and happiness recognition ( p = .04); however, the group effect on fear recognition was only marginally significant ( p = .07).

The difference in the average number of days in the trial, between the control (30 ± 0 days) and treatment (25.2 ± 4.9 days) groups, was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

Further analyzing the second-order simple effects under the same-sex target condition, we found that male participants rated feminine same-sex targets ( M = -.24, SE = .11) as less generally attractive than masculine same-sex targets ( M = .16, SE = .10), F (1,270) = 7.25, p = .008, η p 2 = 0.03; meanwhile, female participants perceived feminine same-sex targets ( M = .21, SE = .10) as more generally attractive than masculine ones ( M = -.06, SE = .11), though the difference was only marginally significant, F (1,270) = 3.25, p = .07, η p 2 = 0.01, as shown in Figure 4 .

For CO-associated simple conversion events with one-side GC f /AT f polymorphism, the conversion bias toward the GC f haplotype was slightly weaker and only marginally significant ( b = 0.06, P = 0.07, one-sample proportion test), probably because of limited sample size ( N = 435 events).

No significant correlations ( p s > 0.1) were found between the ELS subcales and lifetime ayahuasca intake (ELS-v: ρ = 0.08, n.s.; ELS-f: ρ = 0.01, n.s.), and only marginally significant correlations emerged between the ELS subscales and the age of initial ayahuasca intake (ELS-v: r = 0.10, p = 0.07; ELS-f: r = 0.13, p = 0.05).

TDC 91.5%), though the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

When analysed as the dependent measure to predict cumulative conceptual interference using GLMER, we obtain the same trend observed on recognition responses but it is only marginally significant (β = -.11, p = 0.07).

We found that the main effect of visual field was significant ( F (1,76) = 48.17, p < 0.0001), while the main effect of contrast was only marginally significant ( F (1,76) = 3.37, p = 0.07).

Mixed-effects modeling for the cognates revealed that RTs were shorter for words that had been rated as more P similar, though this difference was only marginally significant ( p >.07).

The mortality rates of the experimental groups were significantly higher at 25 °C than at 15 °C for CgA1-1 ( χ 2 = 5.30, df = 1, p < 0.05), while only marginally significant for CgA1-2 ( χ 2 = 3.20, df = 1, p = 0.07).

Age and FIMTM rating at admission turned out to have only marginally significant negative effects on FIM TM score at discharge (both P -values = 0.07).

In this model, all other relations between maternal/pregnancy characteristics and sUA levels remained similar to those reported in Table 2 , except the interaction between Fetal Sex and the Morning Slope of sUA was not statistically significant nor trending and the interaction between Maternal Age and Pregnancy Stage was only marginally significant ( b =-0.05, SE=0.03, p =0.07, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.004]).

However, the effect of the housing condition was only marginally significant [ F (1, 32) = 3.41, P = 0.07].

Summing over both coding and noncoding sites, we also find that mean selective constraint is also reduced somewhat in humans, compared with chimpanzees (0.254 versus 0.279), although this difference is only marginally significant (Bootstrap t-test, P<0.07).

Furthermore, an increased mortality rate of nymphs (all instars included) was observed for both GxABT-1 and GHA (53.3% and 28.6% against 14.3% for control), although the difference was only marginally significant (GLMM: χ 2 = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.07).

A genotype × system interaction accounted for 11.4% of the total variation in exudation, though it was only marginally significant (p = 0.07; Fig. 2 c).

This main effect was due to that confidence rating was higher when participants responded perceiving a fearful than angry or happy face, although the differences were only marginally significant ( P = 0.07, P = 0.08, respectively) ( Figure 5 A, left).

Severe preoperative LAVVR and AV valve abnormalities were only marginally significant ( P =0.07 and 0.19, respectively) ( Table 3 ).

Percentage of alters in stress support networks with more experience than the ego was positively related to stress among egos who were not early-career educators ( β = 0.18, p < 0.05); the differential association between early and non-early career egos for more experience among stress support alters was only marginally significant for stress ( β = − 0.39, p = 0.07).

These effects both existed but were weaker and only marginally significant for AI partners (MD: log-odds ratio: 0.51, SE = 0.29, Wald test: z = 1.76, p = 0.07, and E: log-odds ratio: −0.51, SE = 0.29, Wald test: z = −1.76, p = 0.07).

The only marginally significant relation found was between multilingualism as a continuous score and RT specifically in incongruent trials [ t (154) = 1.82, p = 0.070].

Second, Agren and Schemske ( 1993 ) found only marginally significant effects of herbivory on fitness (flower production, P = 0.07), but noted specifically that their design had low power to detect such effects.

In the fifth review, a significant difference between experimental and control interventions was detected when all trials were synthesized that became only marginally significant (p < .07) when the meta-analysis was adjusted for study quality [ 30 ].

In contrast to girls, the correlation of TA and performance was only marginally significant in boys (Pearson r = −0.110; p = 0.07; Spearman R = −0.106; p <0.07).