Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantP = 0.0781.6× alphagold
In contrast, in the tour boat context, when we ask subjects about John’s utility, the difference between the conditions is only marginally significant, with a small effect size (everyone acts: M = 0.88, SE = 0.032; only John acts: M = 0.96, SE = 0.020; χ 2 ( 1 ) Yates’ corrected = 3.11, P = 0.078 ; φ = 0.12 ).
The logic of universalization guides moral judgment.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2020 · PMC7584905
only marginally significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
10 ) circle (blind) ( P < 0.001), circle ( P < 0.001), triangle ( P = 0.027), square, although the latter was only marginally significant after Bonferroni’s P value adjustment ( P = 0.079), with the exception of crickets navigating a quadrilateral arena ( P = 1).
only marginally significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
In this SEM, there are significant relationships between some socio-demographic variables and the distance from the mining operation site ( Table 2 ): larger households tend to be found further away from the mine (β = 1.08±0.22, P<0.001) and community members who have been residing for longer period in the MKLM are also found further away from the mine, but this relationship is only marginally significant (β = 0.04±0.02, P = 0.079).
only marginally significantp = .0791.6× alphagold
In relation to factors that relate specifically to crime and imprisonment, those with a history of property offenses had an increased rate of violent prison misconduct compared to those without a history of property offences, but this relationship was only marginally significant ( p = .079).
only marginally significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
A factorial PERMANOVA including treatment (defined as the combination of selection type and inoculation factor) and lineage revealed that treatment explained a substantial proportion of rhizosphere microbiome variation ( R 2 = 0.36, P = 0.001), whereas lineage accounted for a much smaller proportion of variance ( R 2 = 0.02) and was only marginally significant ( P = 0.079).