“only marginally significant”

In women with CKD stage 4, the P value was significant in Models 1 and 2 but was only marginally significant in Model 3 ( P = .080) (Table 3 and Fig. 4 ).

This effect was significant for all age groups (all p s < .05): accuracy was significantly lower for the FB trials than for the TB trials and the control trials (which included MC and filler trials) in all age groups (all p s < .05), except in the 35–49 group for which the difference between the FB trials and the TB trials was only marginally significant ( p = .08).

Within-group comparisons pointed to a greater proportion of processing (sporadic + random errors) than morphosyntactic (consistent + systematic errors) in the control group (Wilcoxon Z = −7.65; p < 0.0001) and a similar profile although only marginally significant for PPA-S (Wilcoxon Z = −1.706; p = 0.08).

A significant difference between groups is observed between the PD-PIGD group and the control group ( p = 0.026), while the difference between the two Parkinson’s groups is only marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

When this support fell, levels of stress rose but the change was only marginally significant ( p < 0.08).

After removing these participants, the relationship between ΔRewP and BDI-II cognitive scores was only marginally significant [ r (113) = -0.17, P = 0.08, 95% CI (−0.34, −0.02)].

More patients who received upfront steroids had neurologic symptoms at the diagnosis of BM, but this was only marginally significant (68.6% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.08).

In terms of academic performance, significant improvements in English exam scores for the intervention group were observed at 3‐month follow‐up (estimated mean difference: 4.19, 95% CI: 0.23–8.16, p = .04), but the overall interaction effect was only marginally significant ( p = .08) (Table S1 ).

Break in available nitrate panel is from 6 to 15 μg N g soil −1 and the two asterisks in panel B indicate that the pairwise comparisons between letters b and c are only marginally significant, p < 0.08).

At posttest, fewer men rated their risk of developing prostate cancer to be lower than men of the same age, but this was only marginally significant (75% to 67%; P =.08).There was no change in the percentage of men who believed that they were “certain” or “very likely” to develop the disease in the next 5 years (data not shown).

The exception to this was the comparison of the “damage my lungs” item for the Straw City ad viewing condition, compared to the control condition, which was only marginally significant ( p = .08) but in the same direction as the other comparisons.

As shown in Figure 3 A, the OS of patients whose tumors expressed high CDC25C levels was inferior to the OS of patients whose tumors expressed low CDC25C levels, but this analysis was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

While the main effects of cue validity on RTs were only marginally significant with a trend towards faster RTs for valid cues compared to invalid cues, F (1, 24) = 3.4, p = 0.08, there was a stronger main effect of cue type, F (1, 24) = 10.2, p = 0.004, where RTs were slower when the target preceding cues were numbers ( M = 568 ms) compared to when they were rectangles ( M = 544 ms).

However, with only five herbivore exclusion samples, this difference was only marginally significant (repeated-measures ANOVA, P = 0.08, DF = 1,8, F = 4.0).

Among those smoking 20 or more cpd, the association was only marginally significant ( P = 0.08).

Low TMT was also associated with in-hospital recovery (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38–0.86, P = 0.007), but this association was only marginally significant when adjusted for covariates (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42–1.06, P = 0.08).

Mean abundance of the total target taxa was greatest in the traps along the forest edge but the effect of trap position was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08) ( Table 4 ; Figure 6 F). 4.

The model was significantly associated with increased levels of Cov-Anx ( F (5, 928) = 225.4, p < 0.001), but the interaction between positive and negative religious coping was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

Proportions of euthanasia were highest in puppies less than six months of age (30.6%), dogs 12–18 months (28.0%) and dogs over 24 months of age (27.7%), however, these differences were only marginally significant ( P = 0.08).

We observed a slight, (but) only marginally significant, difference between the slopes of neural crest-involved and segmentation defects (t = 1.810, p = 0.08).

However, the overall effect of limited water across N treatments was a 9% reduction in nitrogen productivity (Table 3 ), although the effect was only marginally significant (P = 0.08).

Mental distress was higher among married participants but only marginally significant (aPR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.96–1.90, p = 0.081) (Table 4 ).

In the same way, mice injected with the intracellular Zn 2+ chelator DEDTC displayed significantly lower freezing than the ZnEDTA control group ( P < 0.001), the AP5 group ( P = 0.002), and the CaEDTA group, although the difference was only marginally significant in this case ( P = 0.081).

The results were corroborated by the Kruskal–Wallis test and the pairwise Wilcoxon test as post hoc analysis, with the exception of males in the CS‐WW group, where advancement of sexual development time was only marginally significant ( p = .081). 3.3.

The difference for the Adjacency metric was in the same direction but only marginally significant, t (19) = 1.84, p = .081, η 2 = .151.