“only marginally significant”

Yet this difference was only marginally significant after FDR correction ( p = 0.040), suggesting that diameter provides less distinct microstructural information compared to more robust parameters such as V in , which need to be further validated in a larger cohort.

Similarly, family‐ and order‐level analyses yielded only marginally significant ( p = 0.04) or non‐significant results, suggesting that ecological signals become diluted when taxa are aggregated to higher ranks.

The downregulation of aggrecan was only marginally significant ( p = 0.04) and is concomitant with increased proteolytic activity in diseased tissue.

However, the difference was only marginally significant ( P = .04).

4B ), but the difference between the groups was only marginally significant ( p =0.0401) because of high inter-individual variability.

Erosions were more prevalent among women than men (64.3% versus 59.7%; P = 0.003), although the difference was not statistically significant in 'low' prevalence countries (53.6% versus 51.6%; P = 0.36) and was only marginally significant in 'high' prevalence countries (76.7% versus 71.9%; P = 0.041).

Moreover, year had an effect ( F 2,91 = 4.05, P = 0.021), but the higher frequency of PR1 in 2011 compared to in 2010 was only marginally significant ( P = 0.041).

Figure 1 shows that for the HRMD group the reaction time bias was significantly greater than zero (i.e., reaction time for body image < for neutral image) for images with large musculature ( t 32 = 7.67, p < .0001) but only marginally significant for those with smaller musculature ( t 32 = 2.13, p = .041), suggesting a positive reaction bias toward body images with larger musculature in this group.

Once again, as was discussed earlier for the pH response variable, although the statistics indicated a significant effect of temperature, and the interaction between pressure and temperature on the TSS of the SC–CO 2 -treated functional araticum beverage, these effects were only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.041, which is very close to 0.05) and, therefore, they can be neglected.

Similarly, resistance to 5-flucytosine occurred at a greater rate in cryptococcal pneumonia infection (12.5%), but the association was only marginally significant (p-value = 0.041).

However, the association between expression variation and toxicity degree for the non-TATA-containing group is only marginally significant (R 2 = 0.13%, β = -0.02338, p-value = 0.0413).

Specifically, sex- and age-related changes occurred across all tracts and were only marginally significant for FA ( p = .042) with a larger decrease for females only in late adulthood.

The correlation between the PS and the number of native species per site was only marginally significant when status was considered at a large (60 km) spatial scale (r = 0.372, 28 d.f., P = 0.042), and not significant for other scales.

However, the correlation is only marginally significant (Spearman correlation = 0.83, p = 0.042), probably due to C. difficile who's isolates we analyzed all contained CRISPR–Cas systems. 3.2.

The differences between the third and the fourth vincentile as well as between the fourth and the fifth vincentile were only marginally significant (with a Bonferroni-adjusted alpha of 0.0063), t (23) = −2.15, p = 0.042, d z = 0.44, and t (23) = 2.68, p = 0.013, d z = 0.55, respectively.

CRM+ occurrence was approximately 5 fold greater in the open group than in the robot-assisted group; however, the difference in incidence between the 2 groups was only marginally significant (P = 0.042 in 1-sided verification).

The zNGF-zGF was highly significantly different ( p < 0.001) between MDMD and controls, whereas the differences between SDMD and controls were only marginally significant ( p = 0.042). 3.3.

Despite greater impairments in AD than MCI, the difference between MCI and AD was only marginally significant in three ROIs including L.cACC, R.cACC, and R.ACB (L.cACC: p = 0.042; R.cACC: p = 0.023; R.ACB: p = 0.041, uncorrected) (Fig. 3c ).

That is, the duration of exposure at higher temperatures had a highly significant impact (P>0.0001) on survival, but only marginally significant (P = 0.0423) at lower temperatures.

Using a Bonferroni comparison for post-hoc analysis, this difference was only marginally significant (p = .043, mean difference ± SD between taVNS-Sham: 0.86 ± 1.88°C).

Results of the competition experiment showed that the number of females inseminated by irradiated males (14.0±1.7) was lower than those inseminated by wild males (19.7±1.7) although this difference was only marginally significant (t=2.779; P=0.043).

The strength of the association between cord Pb and cognitive planning remained similar when controlling for these additional covariates, although the p-value slightly increased and the association was now only marginally significant (from β = −0.146, 95 % CI = [−0.285, −0.001], p = 0.043, to β = −0.151, 95 % CI = [−0.305, −0.001], p = 0.052).

The asymmetric (summed-harmonic 3 Hz) response amplitude for blue-yellow was 44% larger than for green-red over occipitoparietal channels, which while only marginally significant ( P = 0.043) was a medium effect size (d = 0.51).

Hormone therapy and postmenopausal status were only marginally significant with HF frequency respectively (aCO = −2.32, 95% CI [−4.55, −0.08], p = 0.043; and aCO = −2.62, 95% CI [−5.14, −0.11], p = 0.041).

After adjusting for baseline values via ANCOVA, the difference between groups remained statistically significant for the Zulewski score (adjusted p=0.004) but only marginally significant for TSH (adjusted p=0.043).