“only marginally significant”

For the top 2.5% of mutants with the highest growth on inosine in the Cameron library, the paired response for Grant Library mutants was more varied, and the average difference was only marginally significant (two-sample paired t = 2.25, df = 13, and P = 0.043).

The strength of the association between cord Pb and cognitive planning remained similar when controlling for these additional covariates, although the p-value slightly increased and the association was now only marginally significant (from β = −0.146, 95 % CI = [−0.285, −0.001], p = 0.043, to β = −0.151, 95 % CI = [−0.305, −0.001], p = 0.052).

The entire clutch of eggs was consumed more quickly when nest abundance low, although the difference was only marginally significant (Z = 2.02, p = 0.043).

The regression between final aphid population size and plant biomass was highly significant for the wild wheat (χ 2 = 639.79, df = 1, p < 0.001) but only marginally significant for the domesticated plants (to χ 2 = 4.085, df = 1, p = 0.0433) ( Figure 2 ).

We found only marginally significant differences in niche breadths between the lineages ( F m = 3.3, p = 0.0436); the Orange lineage has a broader niche than the Red lineage ( p = 0.0335), while the other pairs are statistically comparable.

The most common haplotype (TGTAC) showed a higher frequency in cases than in controls, 0.76 versus 0.73, which was only marginally significant ( P = 0.044).

In the best-fitting model for gnat2:mYFP-2A-trβ2;mpv17 −/− adults, the long-wavelength R1 cone (Vr575) contributes the largest amplitude signal with the R2 amplitude (Vr556) being only 22% as large, significantly less than R1 ( t (2748) = 5.23, p = 2.6 × 10 −17 ), and the gnat2:trβ2 R1 amplitudes are only marginally significant ( t (1375) = 2.02, p = 0.044; Fig. 10 C ).

Likewise, the interaction effect is only marginally significant ( p = 0.044) in a relatively small sample size.

As expected, due to lack of recombination in males, the trimmed (non‐recombining) sequence length was larger for X‐linked than autosomal loci (4001.89 and 3047.67 respectively, t = 3.5, p < 0.001); the difference was only marginally significant for the original total sequence length (4800.1 and 4730.7, respectively, t = 2.1, p < 0.044).

Inversely, haplotype AGA was significantly associated with a higher risk of severe acne vulgaris in male patients (OR = 1.822, P = 0.002), and haplotype AGA also affected risk in the whole patient group, but the P value was only marginally significant (OR = 1.350, P = 0.044), and this positive association disappeared after Bonferroni correction.

SCC and MCI differed significantly on the AADL subscore (Figure 1C ), while differences in the IADL subscore and total T‐ADLQ score were only marginally significant ( p = 0.044 and p = 0.033, respectively; Table 2 ; Figures 1B and 1D ).

In Illuminate‐2 analyses, the adjusted association between SRI‐5 response and inclusion in a TB treatment group was only marginally significant (aOR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.01‐1.75, P = 0.044).

Regarding publishers, none of the publishing companies with at least 2 journals managed to achieve full compliance with data accessibilities ( S1 Data ), and the differences between publishers are only marginally significant ( p = 0.0447; S3 Fig ).

historical controls) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.045, Fig. 3 ).

The relative risk reduction associated with CEA for 50-69% stenosis was only marginally significant ( P = 0.045) in the NASCET, and the ECST showed no risk reduction at all for CEA in this particular group of patients.

We observed that a higher number of platforms used was significantly associated with a higher BMI in the age-adjusted model but was only marginally significant in the multivariable-adjusted model ( P =.045 and P =.07, respectively).

However, in the multivariable logistic model, only the farmers’ district, and history of illness were significant, and education level was only marginally significant with the positive practice level ( p = 0.045).

However, the association between continuous variables of total PA and the risk of MACEs was only marginally significant in males [adjusted OR = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94~1.00), p -value = 0.045] after adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.

Specifically, considering the Bonferroni correction, the impact of identity profiles belonging on life satisfaction was only marginally significant, F (3, 102) = 2.78, p = 0.045.

The relative risk reduction associated with CEA for 50-69% stenosis was only marginally significant ( P = 0.045) in the NASCET, and the ECST showed no risk reduction at all for CEA in this particular group of patients.

Also, the highly significant difference that we had originally observed for the C out -scores of these two populations is now only marginally significant (0.351 versus 0.389, respectively; Wilcoxon rank sum test, P -value = 0.045).

However, after this adjustment, the unexpected lower mortality with AWS is only marginally significant ( P = .045) and may be a statistical false-positive.

However, this finding should be interpreted with caution as the group differences were only marginally significant after adjusting for age ( p = 0.046).

46 We found that person conducting the pretest discussion and cost are significantly associated with women’s choice of getting tested, while sample type (noninvasive buccal swab preferred) is only marginally significant ( P =0.046).

However, the strength of the association was only marginally significant after further adding BMI and WC into model 4 (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.6–0.99, P = 0.046).