“only marginally significant”

MTTLMD was significant at the ASV level ( P <0.05) and only marginally significant at the genus or family levels ( P <0.1).

While 5 clones showed significant fitness increases, 3 clones showed increases that were only marginally significant (p<0.1), and 4 clones did not show any change.

Respondents in the middle quintile also had lower odds of borrowing, although the effect was only marginally significant (Model 1 OR = 0.587; 95% CI: 0.323–1.068; p < 0.10).

For 0.5 and 1 Gy, the differences were only marginally significant (p < 0.1).

Similar to the results obtained for the intron analyses, the Tajima's D values for cox 2-3 were negative (-1.42), but only marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.10).

The remaining two associations (of autonomy with work-related burnout and workload with patient-related burnout) were similar in direction and magnitude, but only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Interestingly, the estimated coefficients are not statistically significant or are only marginally significant ( p < 0.1) in a few cases.

Meanwhile, the impact of having been unemployed continuously is negative but only marginally significant, with p<0.1.

Students majoring in engineering/physics were also found to have lower perceptions of caring but the effect was only marginally significant (β = −0.103, p < 0.10).

Though only marginally significant ( p < .1), CWM SLA, A mass, and N mass, also tended to decrease with canopy cover (Figure 5 ).

The intention to reduce chemsex behavior significantly associated with visiting a mental health clinic (aOR = 4.68, p < 0.05), but its association with attending meetings of a chemsex recovery group was only marginally significant (aOR = 2.96, p < 0.1).

While fruit consumption also increased, this difference was only marginally significant ( P =0.10).

For instance, leaf‐level gas exchange measurements for the trees around the scaffolds suggest that irrigation‐stop trees tended to have higher photosynthesis and stomatal conductance levels than control trees, although these differences were only marginally significant in summer 2020 ( p ≤ .1; Figure S3 e,k).

The same pattern emerged in sample 2, though the difference was only marginally significant at p < 0.10 for psychosomatic complaints (M ls – M lc = −0.41, SE = 0.09, p < 0.001 for irritation; M ls – M lc = −0.22, SE = 0.09, p = 0.066 for psychosomatic complaints; M ls – M lc = 0.29, SE = 0.08, p = 0.001 for self-rated health).

When comparing adverse pregnancy outcomes according to GWG from the second to the third trimester, the proportion of any adverse maternal outcomes, cesarean delivery, and high birth weight gradually increased from insufficient to excessive GWG; nonetheless, these differences were only marginally significant ( p <0.1 for all).

Parents and non-parents both experience increased FWC, although the difference compared with pre-pandemic FWC is only marginally significant ( diff parents = 0.12; p < 0.10, diff non-parents = 0.07; p < 0.10).

However, this correlation was only marginally significant (.05 < p <.10) Comment 16# The operational definition of “frozen signs” needs to be provided Response 16# We agree and to avoid misunderstanding of the reader, we replace frozen by lexical.

The differences between RTs for the neutral and invalid cues were only marginally significant in the TD group ( t (16) = 1.90, p < 0.1) and were not significant in the ASD group ( t (15) = 1.64, p > 0.1).

Although only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), there was a slight increase in likelihood of being diagnosed if the customer reported living near a clinic (OR = 1.558; 95 % CI 0.999-2.430).

Although the environmental correlation was only marginally significant between capitulum number and capitulum size ( r = 0.08 chi-square = 2.7, p = 0.10; Figure 1 E), the environmental correlation between seed production and rhizome production was highly significant ( r = 0.31 chi-square = 41.15, p < 0.0001; Figure 1 F) in Experiment 1. 2.3.

However, the association between groups by institutional situation and latent profile was only marginally significant X2 (3) = 6.1, p = 0.10.

The study had a relatively small sample size and may have been underpowered, several effects were only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the physiological changes emerged during a brief 15-min interaction and began returning toward baseline by the end of the session.

However, these were only marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, Table 3 ).

The same trend was observed in the liver sections stained with H&E and ORO, although the difference between the GCE and CAF groups was only marginally significant ( p = 0.1) ( Figure 2 D–F).

However, post‐hoc simple slopes analyses indicate that the negative slope for ethnic minority students was only marginally significant ( p < .1), and the slope for native Dutch students was non‐significant.