“only marginally significant”

However, these were only marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, Table 3 ).

The same pattern emerged in sample 2, though the difference was only marginally significant at p < 0.10 for psychosomatic complaints (M ls – M lc = −0.41, SE = 0.09, p < 0.001 for irritation; M ls – M lc = −0.22, SE = 0.09, p = 0.066 for psychosomatic complaints; M ls – M lc = 0.29, SE = 0.08, p = 0.001 for self-rated health).

However, the association between groups by institutional situation and latent profile was only marginally significant X2 (3) = 6.1, p = 0.10.

The same trend was observed in the liver sections stained with H&E and ORO, although the difference between the GCE and CAF groups was only marginally significant ( p = 0.1) ( Figure 2 D–F).

While the increased expression of this gene in SKM-1/VCR cells compared to SKM-1 cells was only marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.1), massive upregulation of HAVCR2 was seen in MOLM-13/VCR cells ( p ≤ 0.05) compared to parental MOLM-13 cells.

The correlation between the two subgroups is however only marginally significant [ rs (77) = 0.19, p < 0.1].

As in this model, the coefficients of nPow to using contacts were only marginally significant (i.e., at p < 0.10), we also examined a model (model 3) restricting these two coefficients to zero.

However, post‐hoc simple slopes analyses indicate that the negative slope for ethnic minority students was only marginally significant ( p < .1), and the slope for native Dutch students was non‐significant.

A similar trend was observed in the Korean subsample, though this sex difference was only marginally significant ( p <.10).

Susceptible Progeny of 3167 Show a Level Of Disease Intermediate Between Surviving Progeny and Susceptible Unrelated Animals We compared various survival, parasitological and pyrexic measurements from the susceptible progeny of 3167 with those from the unrelated susceptible animals ( Table 4 ).There were several parameters that were significantly different between the susceptible first-generation progeny and unrelated animals, whereas other parameters, especially those related with time to detection of onset, were only marginally significant (0.05≤p≤ 0.10) or not significant.

Due to data scatter, the further increase in Ca2+, between 1 and 5 min of incubation, is only marginally significant (P < 0.1). .

Finally, self-efficacy has a positive effect on individual resilience (b = 0.552; p < 0.010), but the indirect effect on team resilience is only marginally significant (b = 0.111; p < 0.100).

The Condition × Session interaction was only marginally significant [ F (1, 11) = 3.15, p = 0.10]: the level of performance of dyslexics was higher after CMT than before for both normally spoken words (after: 81% and before: 73%) and for lengthened words (after: 69% and before: 52%).

Households living in a renovated building were more likely to have a family member with AR than those without renovations, but this was only marginally significant ( P <0.1).

The vast majority (80%) of the SWB predictors were significant at the P < 0.001 level, four (16%) were significant at the P < 0.01 level, and one (agreeableness) was only marginally significant ( P < 0.10).

The two picnic conditions did not differ in participation rates ( χ 2 (1) < .08), and the difference between the two starving-children conditions was only marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 2.74, p < .10).

In the case of the CO 2 experiment, a t-test conducted at the final harvest revealed that the actual shoot dry mass for the two treatments was only marginally significant (P = 0.10).

On normal hosts, ΦX174 ΔslyD lysis interval was also somewhat shorter than that of ΦX174 C , although this difference was only marginally significant (Table 1 , 8.9 min rather than 11.4 min, p < 0.1 by 2-tailed t-test).

In the context of the other variables, the observed sharing with the peer was only marginally significant ( β = −.14, p < .10), while being a boy ( β = .19) and parent‐rated prosocial behavior at 2.5–3 years ( β = −.23) remained significant predictors of uncaring traits, F (5, 167) = 5.22, p < .001, adjusted R 2 = .11.

112.3 ± 7.0 mm 3 , but the difference was only marginally significant ( F 1,23 = 2.89, p = .10).

In addition, while the Group × Block interaction was only marginally significant ( F (3,63) = 2.17, p = 0.10), both the increase in N400 from Block 1 to Block 2 and the decrease from Block 2 to Block 3 were significant for MUS (Block 1: −2.79 μV, SD = 1.66; Block 2: −5.46 μV, SD = 2.10; Block 3: −2.23 μV, SD = 2.04; Tukey, 1 vs. 2: p = 0.02, and 2 vs. 3: p = 0.005; main effect of Block: F (3,33) = 5.34, p = 0.004) but not for NM (main effect of Block: F (3,30) = 1.13, p = 0.35; see Figures 4A,B for topographic distributions of effects).

Between-within mean differences among groups were only marginally significant, either for left acromion-to-bed distance [ F (1, 87, 184.80) = 2.86, p < 0.10; partial η 2 = 0.03; Cohen’s d = 0.34] and for right acromion-to-bed [ F (2, 176) = 2.68, p < 0.10; partial η 2 = 0.03; Cohen’s d = 0.34].

This statistical result is fairly robust; if we assume a stronger random effects structure with per-participant random slopes for gender, 11 we still see a significant increase for -en with feminine nouns ( β = 0.65, se = 0.17, z = 3.73, p < 0.001), although the -e increase for masculine nouns is only marginally significant ( β = 0.24, se = 0.12, z = 1.94, p < 0.1).

While spending on these branded drugs decreased significantly by 1.27 % (95 % CI, 0.53 %-2.01 %, p < 0.001), increased spending on generics was only marginally significant (0.60 %; 95 % CI, −0.12 %-1.31 %, p = 0.10).

We found the path to be only marginally significant (standardized weight: −.046, t = −1.8, p < .1).