“probably not significant”

For instance it seems that influenza vaccination is more common in PLwHIV but yet isolating influenza (probably not significant) was more common in PLwHIV.

However, this study was a comparison at a time when the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy had almost disappeared, and the adverse effects of chemotherapy were probably not significant.

However, the consequences are probably not significant because of the limited time frame for data collection.

Secondary outcomes were the postoperative KSS (knee, function) and HSS scores, the postoperative range of motion (ROM), the analysis of radiolucent tibial lines according to Ewald’s method [ 18 ] (classified in 3 stages according to Ewald’s scoring system: ≤4 “probably not significant”, 5–9 “should be closely followed for progression”, ≥ 10 “possible or impending failure regardless of symptoms”), the radiographic measurements (HKA, HKS, LDFA, MPTA, Caton–Deschamps index, tibial slope) and the occurrence of complications according to the standardized definitions of the Knee Society [ 17 ].

These differences are within 1.2-fold, and probably not significant.

Our observations, however, suggest that slab contributions to Li are probably not significant.

Finally, we found several similarities between our data and those of a recent systematic review ( Mirzaei et al., 2020 ); in this case we suspect that the differences observed between the different cohorts are probably not significant.

The trend to lower alpha diversity metrics after 1 and 4 weeks after initiation observed in stool analysis was probably not significant due to the limited number of patients, yet alpha diversity recovered thereafter.

36 The prevalence was also high in our study, but the impact of depression on social isolation and being homebound was probably not significant.

Even though the size of the microspheres usually increases with the increase in drug concentration [ 33 ], the drug–polymer ratio was probably not significant enough to influence the particles’ size.

This absolute value is probably not significant enough to be the sole cause of drug resistance; however, it could contribute to effects caused by other substitutions occurring in the active site, which were not covered in the current study.

However, these numbers are probably not significant as the CI of the hospital tests is so wide.

Furthermore, taking the spectral shift for T203Y and H199Y/T203Y into account, the spectrally corrected microarray fluorescence offered a slightly better fit, although probably not significant ( Fig 4H ).

These discrepancies were probably not significant problems since similar discrepancies were also seen in other studies [ 27 , 30 ].

Nucleosome spacing in a set2Δ mutant (replicates: 165 and 163 bp) is slightly lower than wild type (165 and 165 bp), although this difference is probably not significant (Fig. 4 a).

Furthermore, no significant internal standard peak response variation was observed during the entire sample analysis, which would be able to explain to some extent that the matrix effect was probably not significant.

No significant improvement of the bodyweight of piglets in the current study might be explained by the fact that there was no difficult farrowing observed, no long periods with elevated body temperature or any signs of infection of the mammary gland (the mastitis, metritis, agalactia (MMA) syndrome) recorded in both groups of sows and thus differences in milk yield were most probably not significant.

This limitation is common to all studies using the WHO MONICA criteria, and its influence on our results is probably not significant.

33 However, there are very few homopolymeric runs larger than four nucleotides in the trans-sialidase sequence set, indicating that an increase in error rate by using the Ion Torrent technology is probably not significant.

The contribution of neutral SMases to milk SM hydrolysis is probably not significant because, differing from alk-SMase, they are rapidly inactivated by pancreatic enzymes in the intestinal tract ( 69 ).

37.5%; p = 0.090), probably not significant due to the small sample size ( Table 3 ).

A 0.6 drop difference, although significant statistically, is probably not significant clinically, which may make it difficult to interpret our results.

Therefore, reporting bias is probably not significant to our study.

The very small reduction in sex ratio in the study of Pillarisetti et al is probably not significant.

While the means appear to be different, the differences for Ra in the airfoil orientation and airfoil surface were probably not significant because the interval bars easily overlapped ( Figure 12 b,d).