“probably not significant”

It is also possible that, as mentioned above, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) which are present in the blood of patients with metastatic prostate cancer [ 45 ] could precipitate with blood cells, contributing to the increased level of alpha satellite RNA, although due to the low number of CTCs relative to blood cells, this contribution is probably not significant.

The difference between patients with breast cancer and women with fertility problems tended to be statistically significant (P = 0.0862; Fisher's exact test) and was probably not significant due to the relatively low number of oocytes included.

Care was taken to avoid catheterization of the uterine arteries because an adverse dissection would be perceived disastrous to the donor and recipient, however clinically probably not significant.

Looking at the data gathered by the Italian National Environmental Protection System, it can be noticed that the reduction trend appears less evident after 2018, with even a little increase, probably not significant, in the PM10 concentrations in 2020.

18,19 Naphthalene-1,2-dicarboxaldehyde (11) was recommended as an alternative reagent with claims that the product isoindoles 12 would be more stable, but the proposal seemingly has not received acceptance from the scientific community as the increases in stability are probably not significant to justify the cost of this reagent. 17 Our initial attempt to characterize the product of the three-component reaction between phthalaldehyde 7, amines and thiols ( Fig. 3 ) met with significant synthetic challenges, as evident by the low stability of 10a.

The physiological change on the drivers’ state while driving was probably not significant enough.

The role of these FCV-like viruses in the epidemiology of FCV in both dogs and cats is uncertain [ 40 , 41 ], but is probably not significant.

If the source of limitation cannot be quantified within the economic model, the exact significance cannot be determined neither, so the expectations of the analyst (‘probably significant’ / ‘probably not significant’) carrying out the critical assessment can be presented as an indicative impact when interpreting the results.

While a theoretical increase in risk cannot be excluded, it is probably not significant for the dermatologist in everyday clinical practice.

The difference was probably not significant due to the small sample size in the group with anaemic crisis.

The large difference in median time during recovery period of 2020 is probably not significant due to a low number of patients included in this group.

However, exposure to BPA significantly increased the proliferation rate of T24 cells on day 1 ( Figure 5 C), but its clinical impact is probably not significant.

Nevertheless, considering that HPV-induced cancers predominantly express E6/E7 oncoproteins, this upregulation is most probably not significant in the context of carcinogenesis.

For patients who smoke, the rate is higher, but the association is probably not significant because patients are forced to stop smoking in the weeks preceding and following the procedure.

The observed difference in cut-points (19 and 16.3 for N1 and N2 respectively) is probably not significant as the Youden J passes through a broad maximum between 16 and 20 cases per week/100,000 for both targets.

Nevertheless, this correlation was probably not significant in this study due to the number of patients analyzed.

However, this trend is probably not significant considering the V OC values reported for the three devices in Table 2 .

This analysis showed a significant sex by reappraisal interaction for all scales of the EDEQ: the total scale (b = − 0.15, p < 0.001), eating concern (b = − 0.03, p < 0.001), shape concern (b = − 0.12, p = 0.002) and weight concern (b = − 0.13, p = 0.001), suggesting that the association between reappraisal use and eating psychopathology is stronger in females than males for all aspect of eating psychopathology, but that it was probably not significant due to other significant predictors explaining more of the variance in the models with all emotion predictors.

Another important point to consider when we think about motives related to hedonism or healthiness, is the distinction between utilitarian and hedonic dimensions according to the nature of the product (or how we perceive it): the utilitarian dimension is probably not significant for products we link with pleasure, but it is significant for utilitarian-oriented foods, as it is described for organic foods [ 26 ].

The relatively high g(r) value of carbon atom C10 is probably not significant as it was located at a distance of 4 Å. 3.3.3.

Therefore, this small correction is probably not significant in most practical applications when measuring B-scores using CT images.

The effect of Ni substitutions is probably not significant for the lattice constants due to the low solubility limit of Ni.