Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

The IMPrESS study showed that pwMS treated earlier in the course of the disease showed a trend towards lower total (€39,037 vs €42,996), indirect (€15,733 vs €18,934) and disease-modifying therapy (€19,364 vs €20,491) costs and a better health-related quality of life status (0.62 vs 0.56; p < 0.01) compared to those receiving late treatment [ 3 ].
Dietary antioxidant phytochemicals have demonstrated protective effects and the presence of these compounds in the traditional Mediterranean diet may be partly responsible for the low incidence of CMM in this area, despite high levels of solar radiation; other studies showed a trend towards a reduced risk of CMM with a greater intake of vegetables and fruit, fish, as well as vitamins and beverages such as coffee or tea [ 11 , 12 ].
The primary endpoint was the mean change in the lesion area from baseline to month 18 as measured by fundus autofluorescence ( 79 ).” The results showed a trend for a reduction in GA progression of 20% in the lampalizumab group, but there was no significant difference between the lampalizumab and sham groups ( 79 ).
(2) With decreasing water application, the cumulative percentage of root length, root surface area and root biomass in 4 rings from the center out to 12 cm of SW soil showed a trend of W50% > W30% > W100% in SW, however, the cumulative percentage of root biomass in 4 layers from the surface to a depth of 36 cm was not significantly different between different water treatments in DN.
Control cancer cells displayed low E-cadherin levels, while both 5FU- and F6-treated cells showed a trend, albeit not significant, toward increased release ( Figure 8 a); β-catenin increases significantly only in 5FU+F6-treated cells, while showing a slight, albeit not significant decrease in the other treatment conditions ( Figure 8 b).
A Cox regression model indicated statistically significant worse 30-day survival in patients operated on with a surgical delay of 12 to 24 hours (HR: 8.30; 95% CI: 1.13-61.4) and ≥48 hours (HR: 11.75; 95% CI: 1.53-90.2) compared to <12 hours surgical delay, whereas surgical delay of 24 to 48 hours (HR: 7.21; 95% CI: 0.98-52.9) showed a trend toward worse survival.