“slightly significant”

However, the association between BMI and nutrition literacy was slightly significant (OR: 0.9, p -value: 0.07).

Further comparisons of the two datasets via linear models (LMs) and generalized linear models (GLMs) unveiled that nonmethylated epiloci (predictor) have a significant and a slightly significant negative correlation with leaf length and number of leaves (responses), respectively ( Table 2 ).

Notably, the significant natural indirect effect of TT on anxiety in men was slightly significant, suggesting that some effects might arise from the direct opioids effect or a combined treatment effect including mediators.

Direct seeding of A-431 and HaCaT cells into AAM also resulted in a slightly significant reduction in cell adhesion.

In comparison with the control group, the Qigong exercise group showed high heterogeneity (SMD = −0.75; 95% CI, −1.17 to −0.32; P = 0.02; I 2 = 67%), suggesting that Qigong exercise had a slightly significant effect on BMI and that the sources of heterogeneity required further assessment in a subgroup analysis.

However, the coefficients of β i are below unity and are statistically significant for BVTA-IEIs except for IEI8 where it is slightly significant and above unity.

In this review, the studies measuring arsenic demonstrate slightly significant associations; this may demonstrate a lack of associations or variability in study populations.

The GAM that used δ 15 N values in blue whale skin stratum basale and externum in relation to time indicated a weak, but slightly significant positive relationship in the GC, and a weak, but slightly significant negative relationship for the CCS ( Table 2 , Fig 3 ).

In describing the sensitivity results we will refer to a PRCC value of 0.85 or higher as “highly significant,” a PRCC value of 0.70–0.84 as “significant,” values of 0.55–0.69 “somewhat significant,” values of 0.45–0.54 as “slightly significant,” values of .40–0.44 as “borderline significant,” and under .40 as “not significant.” As can be seen in the tables, some of the initial conditions may show up as significant or highly significant.

Spearman’s correlation coefficient confirmed these results; age was slightly significant, with a p-value of 0.015 (correlation was found to be significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed)).

Species richness The effect of the treatments for species richness was the strongest for enchytraeids, intermediate for plants and slightly significant for spiders and ground beetles (Table 2 ).

The incidence of stomach cancer (males HR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.82–0.93; females: HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.77–0.97) also seem to be slightly significant across both sexes.

The coefficient values ( r ) and strength of correlation can be categorized as follows: (i) very weak correlation ( r = 0.0–0.2), (ii) slightly significant correlation ( r = 0.2–0.4), (iii) moderate correlation ( r = 0.4–0.6), (iv) strong correlation ( r = 0.6–0.8), and (v) very strong correlation ( r = 0.8–1.0).

In contrast, in aged Cu‐CHA, a slightly lower amount of tri‐coordinate Al was observed in Al Clus3 and Cu Clus2, which are preferentially present at the edge of the particle and showed a slightly significant increase of Cu I .

27 compared cup position between DA and DL THA approaches and found a tendency to antevert the cup with the DA approach, which could explain the slightly significant difference between patient groups.

Conclusion The disease tolerant level between bitter and sweet cassava genotypes was slightly significant.

Three significance levels (“very significant” 0.01, “moderately significant” 0.05, and “slightly significant” 0.10) were assigned to the relationships.

This dramatic enhancement in lncMN2-203 purification was accompanied by a slightly significant (but much lower respect to lncMN2-203) enrichment of the lncMN2-202/204 isoforms, as compared to the control ( Figure 2D and Supplementary Figure 1B ).

We found that both groups showed a significant increase in IRD, static trunk endurance, and maternal quality of life, and there was no statistically significant difference when comparing between the two groups; however, a slightly significant improvement was demonstrated in the offline group.

Using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) the ARFIMA–FIAPARCH model under the Student distribution was adjudged to be the best model in the case of platinum returns although the ARCH-effect was slightly significant while using the Schwarz information criterion (SIC) the ARFIMA–FIAPARCH under the Normal Distribution outperforms all the other models.

The strength of the relevance and main determinants of the prediction of the presented model mostly consisted of mental qualities, while socio-demographic data were slightly significant.

Unlike other studies, both CIs presented a slightly significant IE difference despite the presence of a hexadecyl (−C 16 H 33 ) group, which could have been attributed to the number of functional groups that take part in the adsorption processes.

Other alterations in comparison of clinorotated and 1 g control samples could not be detected and, despite some slightly significant gravity-dependent effects in cdc25C protein expression after 10 min, there were no substantial differences in phosphorylation of cdc2 (Tyr15), cdc25 (Ser216) and cyclinB1 (Ser147) in Jurkat T cells between clinorotated and 1 g control samples in the time frame of 1-10 min.

They reported a slightly significant MRI T1 hyper signal (same marker of IPH) decrease after 12 months of follow-up, which continued to decrease at the 18-month follow-up, whereas at the 6-month follow-up, no significant decrease was observed.

However, for PI, the p -value was 0.008, showing a slightly significant difference.