Although the significant difference between conditions in during-exercise SFI was not observed, the p value for conditions is 0.059, and for interaction, it is 0.076, which is very close to statistical significance.
← all phrases
“very close to statistical significance”
In the literature
From 2018 to 2021, a new increase in the total population was observed, especially due to the increase in females, which was very close to statistical significance [SMR = 2.00 (0.79–4.28)] ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.4.
Age and allergic rhinitis duration were very close to statistical significance, probably due to the small number of patients.
This study also found no significant difference among the four groups in terms of ARI, but the P -value was 0.054, which was very close to statistical significance.
QTLpoly calls QTLs that are very close to statistical significance as “putative” QTLs.
A difference that was very close to statistical significance was detected in terms of rs3805198 genotype and allele distributions; and it was determined that the natural type genotype frequency increased in the patient group (p=0.053).
In addition to the above reported forthrightly supporting data, there are other studies that although not observing significant differences between anti-Ro/SSA-positive and negative patients in terms of mean QTc length and/or QTc prolongation prevalence, nevertheless found differences in these parameters that were very close to statistical significance.
The other comparisons did not produce significant results, although the comparison of scores for the 235‐3M1 combination is worth highlighting, where differences came very close to statistical significance.
The difference is very close to statistical significance.
No regimen showed an obviously improvement than standard chemotherapy, although nivolumab was very close to statistical significance (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.5–1.06).
The UDVA improvement of 0.34 logMAR in the CXL-Plus group was significant, while the 0.19 logMAR improvement in the CXL group was only very close to statistical significance.
15 Despite the fact that most of the data strongly suggest that anti-Ro/SSA-mediated electrophysiological effects have a significant clinical impact, some studies reported partially conflicting results (either slight differences but very close to statistical significance, or no association between anti-Ro/SSA and QTc prolongation), both in adults and in children. 14 Notably, even among studies showing a significant association, markedly different percentages of QTc prolongation in patients with anti-Ro/SSA-positive CTD were observed (from ∼10% to 60%). 14 Although
In the case of the active range of motion of the affected upper extremity in the frontal plane evaluated with the Armeo system ® , the p -value was very close to statistical significance.
Furthermore, from week 4 onwards, weekly differences very close to statistical significance were observed between the two treatment groups; the statistical significance was obtained at week 6 (result with *) with a clear reduction in pain in the group that received IF with respect to the group placebo ( Table 3 ).
Although there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups ( p = 0.051), it was still very close to statistical significance.
In sum, although the results approached very close to statistical significance, the data do not provide sufficiently strong evidence of an association between analysed variables. 4.
Since the interaction effect was very close to statistical significance, and there was a clear trend observable in mid-anterior region similar to Experiment 1, we conducted post-hoc paired t-test at each ROI to examine this effect in further detail.
Stroke risk reduction was significant for D1 and D2 cohorts (adjusted HR between 0.61 and 0.64), and very close to statistical significance for the PD cohort (adjusted HR 0.66, 95CI: 0.43–1.02).
The overall morbidity and mortality were higher in Group 2, and it is very close to statistical significance.