a marked trendp = 0.056
On the other hand, in ch.7, none of the groups showed a marked trend ( r = 0.17, p = 0.056; Real group, r = −0.20, p = 0.14; Sham group).
On the other hand, in ch.7, none of the groups showed a marked trend ( r = 0.17, p = 0.056; Real group, r = −0.20, p = 0.14; Sham group).
Regarding the change of the mean normalized movement distance shown in Figure 4B , the two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction of group × task phase, F (1,28) = 13.34, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.32, and the main effects did not reach statistical significance, F (1,28) = 0.35, p = 0.56, η p 2 = 0.012 for group and F (1,28) = 2.61, p = 0.12, η p 2 = 0.085 for task phase.
By contrast, a decreasing trend was observed for the Sham group.
Regarding the blue circle size, no response showed a trend clearly different from the actual circle size change.