marginally significantp = 0.05
A marginally significant effect was observed in the comparison of the groups of subjects (F(2,20) = 3.34, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.25).
A marginally significant effect was observed in the comparison of the groups of subjects (F(2,20) = 3.34, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.25).
For SD CoP in AP direction, a marginally non-significant effect was observed when comparing pre- and post-Exo data of individuals with MS with that of HSs and (F(2,20) = 3.25, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.24).
Although this appreciable reduction between pre- and post-Exo condition ( Figure 5 f) when comparing these results in both visual conditions, the difference did not reach statistical significance (F(1,3) = 0.58, p = 0.5, η 2 p = 0.16).
Overall, a clear trend of improvement was observed across the parameters considered.
Following training, the results for individuals with MS showed a trend towards the HS values, and the previously observed significant differences between the two groups disappeared.