Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Multilevel meta-analysis of the effect of exercise intervention on inhibitory control in children with ASD.

Front Psychol · 2025 · PMC12546240 · PMID 41143048

5
hedged sentences
0.0510
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0910
boldest claim

The sentences

near-significantp = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Additionally, the near-significant positive effect of training weeks ( β = 0.050, p = 0.051) supports extending intervention duration, while the lack of significance for training frequency suggests that simply increasing session frequency may not be the key factor for improving effectiveness. 4.6 Research limitations and future research directions Although this study provides valuable findings, several important limitations should be carefully considered when interpreting the results.

also in 2,306 other papers

marginal significancep = 0.083so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The age variable demonstrated marginal significance in the linear model ( β = −0.091, p = 0.083), with a negative coefficient suggesting that effects may decrease with increasing age.

also in 5,069 other papers

approached significancep = 0.091so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In the restricted cubic spline regression, the intercept term for age reached significance ( p = 0.014), and its linear term approached significance ( p = 0.091).

also in 8,237 other papers

may not be significantno p-value reported
CS and BR showed the smallest effects, at 0.19 (95% CI: [−0.60, 0.97]) and 0.16 (95% CI: [−0.38, 0.71]) respectively, with both confidence intervals containing zero, suggesting the effects of these interventions may not be significant.

also in 2,774 other papers

SG demonstrated a moderate effect size of 0.51 (95% CI: [−0.13, 1.15]), but similarly did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.