Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Strategies of neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: a study on the effects of treatment frequency and surgery interval.

Front Oncol · 2025 · PMC12603392 · PMID 41229496

3
hedged sentences
0.0590
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0870
boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceP=0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Impact of surgical interval on DFS and OS Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the short-interval group (neoadjuvant therapy to surgery <6 weeks) exhibited a higher survival probability in OS compared to the long-interval group (≥6 weeks), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.059) ( Figure 3 ).

also in 75,278 other papers

near-significantP=0.087so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Regarding perioperative complications, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 3.85% (3 cases) in the short-term group and 0.56% (1 case) in the long-term group, with a near-significant difference (P=0.087).

also in 1,650 other papers

approaching significanceno p-value reported
The median blood loss was 127 mL in the short-term group and 175 mL in the long-term group (P=0.053), a difference approaching significance, suggesting that a longer surgical interval may be associated with increased operative time and higher blood loss.

also in 1,607 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.