Beyond risk reduction: Exploring the relation of cognitive control with adolescent positive and negative risk-taking.

Low‐risk trials showed a positive trend across trials ( M = 0.76, SD = 0.94), whereas high‐risk trials showed a negative trend across trials ( M = −0.30, SD = 0.27), t(107) = 10.80, p < .001.

also in 4,201 other papers

Although the overall interaction between proactive control and risk type approached significance, F (2, 208) = 3.43, p = .034, p adj = .067, examination of specific contrasts revealed a significant interaction between proactive control and willingness for PRT, β = 0.242, SE = 0.100, p = .017, p adj = .036, while the interaction with past PRT was not significant after correction, β = 0.208, SE = 0.100, p = .038, p adj = .064 (Figure 1b ).

also in 8,237 other papers

Additionally, the flanker congruency effect for accuracy demonstrated a marginally significant positive correlation with NRT, r = .19, p = .051, suggesting that individuals with greater susceptibility to interference may be more prone to NRT.

also in 26,082 other papers

For past PRT, no significant interval was identified, indicating that effortful control effects did not reach statistical significance at any age level.

also in 111,027 other papers