borderline significanceP = 0.051
The borderline significance of the primary outcome ( P = 0.051) may reflect insufficient power for subgroup interactions, though the tracheotomy-specific effect reached statistical significance.
The borderline significance of the primary outcome ( P = 0.051) may reflect insufficient power for subgroup interactions, though the tracheotomy-specific effect reached statistical significance.
While the primary outcome of overall PPCs reduction showed a strong trend without reaching conventional statistical significance (26.7% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.051), we observed clinically important improvements in several key areas: significantly better intraoperative respiratory mechanics with lower peak inspiratory pressures and improved dynamic compliance, superior oxygenation parameters, a statistically significant reduction in hospital length of stay (9 vs. 10 days, P = 0.041), and most notably, a substantial reduction in PPCs incidence among tracheotomy patients (30.8% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.032).
Conclusions For patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery with free flap reconstruction who were at intermediate or high risk of developing PPCs, PCV-VG could shorten the length of stay in hospital and showed a trend toward being superior to VCV in its ability to provide ventilation with lower peak inspiratory pressure, greater dynamic compliance, and better oxygenation.
This 7.5% absolute risk reduction approached but did not reach statistical significance and aligned with our pre-trial hypothesis of PCV-VG’s lung-protective benefits.