Barely Significant
← all excerpts

RapidArc dynamic versus RapidArc: A multi anatomical-site dosimetric evaluation.

J Appl Clin Med Phys · 2026 · PMC12800903 · PMID 41532265

4
hedged sentences
0.0400
closest p · 0.8× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.040actually significant
No significant differences were detected for the optic nerves ( p > 0.05), while the optic chiasm PRV showed a trend toward reduction (−5.6%, p = 0.040).

also in 31,039 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Rectum D10 cc decreased by ≈6% ( p = 0.040), and although V60 Gy reduction did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07), the direction favored RAD.

also in 61,332 other papers

The mean heart dose was also reduced by approximately 25%, with a corrected p = 0.024, representing a strong trend toward significance, while the ipsilateral lung V20 did not differ significantly between techniques ( p = 0.48), see Table 3 .

also in 56 other papers

trending toward significanceno p-value reported
After Bonferroni correction ( m = 3; adjusted α = 0.0167), both parameters remained trending toward significance, indicating a consistent improvement in parotid sparing.

also in 273 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.