approached significanceP = .053
After matching, RT+PD-1 showed a higher objective response rate (ORR) that approached significance (48.4% vs 37.6%, P = .053).
After matching, RT+PD-1 showed a higher objective response rate (ORR) that approached significance (48.4% vs 37.6%, P = .053).
Cox regression demonstrated a favorable trend for the combination therapy (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.54-1.02, P = .066), although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 2 ).
In other subgroups, including patients with prior treatment exposure or without distant metastasis, HRs generally favored RT+PD-1, although interaction tests were not statistically significant and subgroup-specific differences did not reach conventional levels of significance.
Patients treated with RT+PD-1 showed a trend toward improved OS compared with those receiving RT alone.
The proportions of patients with more than 2 tumors (43.3% vs 40.2%, P = .177), PVTT (28.7% vs 26.3%, P = .289), and distant metastasis (27.4% vs 37.1%, P = .124) were numerically different but did not reach statistical significance.