Comparison of the predictive value of upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials for functional recovery in subacute stroke: a retrospective study.

J Rehabil Med · 2026 · PMC12983128 · PMID 41804271

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0580

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0870

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In contrast, no statistically significant group differences were observed for FIM scores; however, the MEP abnormal group showed a trend towards greater improvement ( B = 6.47, p = 0.058).

also in 53,322 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.087so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Compared with the SEP non-responsive group, the SEP abnormal group exhibited greater improve-ments in upper limb motor function (FMA-U/L), although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( B = 4.51, p = 0.087).

also in 111,027 other papers

a near-significant trendno p-value reported

Regarding MEP, significant improvements were observed in BBT performance for the normal group and in K-MBI scores for both the abnormal and normal groups, whereas the FIM showed only a near-significant trend in the abnormal group.

also in 290 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.