near-significantp < 0.10
The Friedman test examined repeated-measures (within-resident) phase effects, and post-hoc tests were conducted when there was a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or near-significant ( p < 0.10) effect.
The Friedman test examined repeated-measures (within-resident) phase effects, and post-hoc tests were conducted when there was a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or near-significant ( p < 0.10) effect.
Although the Friedman test indicated a significant overall effect for contouring time ( p = 0.018), pairwise Wilcoxon comparisons between individual phases did not reach statistical significance (all p = 0.125 after adjustment), suggesting gradual rather than discrete improvements in efficiency over the course of training.
Friedman tests confirmed statistically significant overall effects for HD ( p = 0.050), AVD ( p = 0.039), and Time ( p = 0.018), while DSC showed a positive trend that did not reach significance ( p = 0.174).
Three structure-specific metrics achieved statistically significant improvements, with one additional measure approaching significance.