Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Evaluation of efficacy in prostate cancer contouring for MR-guided radiotherapy using structured contouring training modules.

Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol · 2026 · PMC13011055 · PMID 41884629

4
hedged sentences
0.1000
closest p · 2.0× alpha
0.1740
boldest claim

The sentences

near-significantp < 0.10so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The Friedman test examined repeated-measures (within-resident) phase effects, and post-hoc tests were conducted when there was a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or near-significant ( p < 0.10) effect.

also in 1,650 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.125not close (p > 0.1)
Although the Friedman test indicated a significant overall effect for contouring time ( p = 0.018), pairwise Wilcoxon comparisons between individual phases did not reach statistical significance (all p = 0.125 after adjustment), suggesting gradual rather than discrete improvements in efficiency over the course of training.

also in 75,278 other papers

a positive trendp = 0.174not close (p > 0.1)
Friedman tests confirmed statistically significant overall effects for HD ( p = 0.050), AVD ( p = 0.039), and Time ( p = 0.018), while DSC showed a positive trend that did not reach significance ( p = 0.174).

also in 6,774 other papers

approaching significanceno p-value reported
Three structure-specific metrics achieved statistically significant improvements, with one additional measure approaching significance.

also in 1,607 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.