a negative trendp = 0.001
At 24 h, with the HFNC failure group showing a negative trend compared to the HFNC success group (-1.00 ± 2.64 vs. 2.91 ± 3.73, p = 0.001).
At 24 h, with the HFNC failure group showing a negative trend compared to the HFNC success group (-1.00 ± 2.64 vs. 2.91 ± 3.73, p = 0.001).
Although the reduction in pneumonia did not reach statistical significance, the antiemetic group showed a favorable trend compared with placebo (39/237 (16.5%) antiemetic, 90/278 (32.4%) placebo; mean difference 15.9%, RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.15–1.28, p = 0.15).
Both groups showed an increasing trend in bilateral TFdi.
The LPS-EVLP injury model showed a trend towards higher STING expression compared with uninjured lungs, and STING protein expression co-localised with alveolar epithelium, indicating the involvement of STING in lung injury.