Due to the limited sample size, the difference in survival between the two groups did not reach statistical significance.
← all excerpts
Efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for glioblastoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
3
—
—
The sentences
In between-intervention comparisons, nivolumab had HRs of 1.44 (95% CrI: 1.00-2.06) versus bevacizumab and 1.31 (95% CrI: 1.06–1.63) versus rindopepimut, indicating a suggestive trend of relatively poorer survival (Figure S3).
In patients with recurrent GBM, while nivolumab demonstrated statistical significance compared to bevacizumab, the unmethylated subgroup exhibited a clear trend toward inferior survival (HR > 1, median OS 8.0 vs. 8.9 months).