highly significantp<0.0005
However, there was a highly significant Ear of Delivery×Hemisphere interaction (F (2,16) = 13.03, p<0.0005).
However, there was a highly significant Ear of Delivery×Hemisphere interaction (F (2,16) = 13.03, p<0.0005).
UA, −0.02%), but this effect failed to reach statistical significance (F (1,8) = 3.84, p<0.09).
Amplitude changes of sensory responses and attention effects within blocks As in the medial grid, SDA amplitudes in the lateral grid tended to decline over the block, but the results failed to reach significance (F (4,40) = 2.44, p<0.11).
ARMs showed a trend toward an opposite Ear of Delivery×Hemisphere interaction from that seen for sensory responses: ARMs tended to be larger over the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulated ear than over the contralateral hemisphere (F (2,16) = 4.00, p<0.09).
F-ratios and probabilities are reported for significant results and results approaching significance, whereas F-ratios alone are presented for other comparisons.