a clear trendP = 0.064
Even though there was a clear trend, the ratio of center time/perimeter time for KCa3.2 T/T mice was not statistically different from that of KCa3.1 −/− /KCa2.3 T/T mice (P = 0.064; Figure 2G ).
Even though there was a clear trend, the ratio of center time/perimeter time for KCa3.2 T/T mice was not statistically different from that of KCa3.1 −/− /KCa2.3 T/T mice (P = 0.064; Figure 2G ).
However, after exclusion of the KCa3.2 T/T mice with less than 20 entries, alteration rates appeared normal in the KCa3.2 T/T mice (P = 0.81) while DOX-treated KCa3.1 −/− /KCa3.2 T/T mice showed a trend towards decreased alteration rates compared to DOX-treated KCa3.2 T/T (P = 0.065; Figure 3E ).
However, there was a trend for DOX treatment to reduce the grip strength in KCa3.1 −/− /KCa2.3 T/T mice ( Figure 3C ), even though the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09).