Prefrontal control of the amygdala during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of emotion regulation.

4 and Table 2 , only four other VAR interactions (out of total 49) exhibited linear trends that were either significant or approaching significance for EG: rACC = >self (LT(RE...R3), t (13) = 2.789, P <0.015); left DMPFC = >right DMPFC (LT(RE...R3), t (13) = −1.837, P <0.089); left DMPFC = >left SFG (LT(RE...R3), t (13) = −2.346, P <0.036); and right MFPC = >left SFG (LT(RE...R3), t (13) = 2.083, P <0.058).

also in 2,640 other papers

2A ) exhibited a linear trend across the experiment that was nonsignificant with a trend toward significance (LT(RE...TR): t (13) = 2.085, P <0.057).

also in 3,729 other papers

Comparison of the mean BOLD activity levels between EG and CG showed a trend toward a difference for the Transfer run ( t (26) = 1.839, P <0.077).

also in 53,322 other papers

The same lagged effect in Model II showed a positive linear trend that was marginally significant (rACC = >LA: LT(RE...R3), t (13) = 1.776, P <0.099).

also in 26,082 other papers

4 , Table 2 ), as the most relevant ones, the corrected results approached significance, with FDR q <0.055 for the four most significant trends in Table 2 .

also in 8,237 other papers

The lagged effects for EG showed a positive trend, which, however, was not significant (rACC = >LA: LT(RE...R3), t (13) = 1.554, P <0.144; LT(RE...TR), t (13) = 1.350, P <0.200).

also in 11,005 other papers