Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Visuo-tactile interactions in the congenitally deaf: a behavioral and event-related potential study.

Front Integr Neurosci · 2014 · PMC4300915 · PMID 25653602

4
hedged sentences
0.0780
closest p · 1.6× alpha
0.0780
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.078so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The Stimulus type (T, [VT + nostim – V]) × Group (deaf, hearing) ANOVA on P100 amplitudes revealed a marginally significant main effect of Stimulus type, F (1, 18) = 3.50, p = 0.078, with larger amplitudes for [VT + nostim – V] than for unisensory tactile responses T ( M = 4.0 vs. 3.2 μV), indicating a tendency for multisensory interactions about 100 ms after stimulus presentation in both deaf and hearing participants.

also in 17,465 other papers

The response time difference between the visual and tactile condition in deaf individuals, however, did not reach statistical significance and is therefore rather unlikely to be the reason for the reduced redundancy gain observed in the deaf.

also in 78,910 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported
This group difference was significant for tactile and approached significance for visual targets.

also in 6,004 other papers

approaching significanceno p-value reported
We found tactile P300 amplitudes to be significantly larger in deaf than in hearing participants whereas the group difference for visual P300 amplitudes pointed into the same direction approaching significance.

also in 1,814 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.