approached significancep = 0.08
deprived smokers (Figure 1 , p = 0.4, Nabs = 24, Ncont = 23), though the difference between sated and deprived smokers approached significance (Figures 1A,B , p = 0.08, Nabs = 24, Nsat = 13).
deprived smokers (Figure 1 , p = 0.4, Nabs = 24, Ncont = 23), though the difference between sated and deprived smokers approached significance (Figures 1A,B , p = 0.08, Nabs = 24, Nsat = 13).
Although the results point to the SFG as the most relevant area, almost all regions showed a trend in the same direction, making it hard to pinpoint the interhemispheric connectivity effect of tobacco to a single defined region.
When we used FA we found the same result but it did not reach statistical significance.