Learning and Overnight Retention in Declarative Memory in Specific Language Impairment.

Moreover, for novel words, although both groups showed increases between the two delays, this effect reached borderline significance for the SLI group ( F (1, 20) = 4.314, p = .051, η p 2 = .177) but not for the TD group ( F (1, 20) = 1.591, p = .222, η p 2 = .074).

also in 370 other papers

However, the two significant main effects were qualified by a significant interaction between Group and Delay ( F (1, 40) = 1.478, p = .034, η p 2 = .107) and an interaction between Group and Real/Novel that approached significance ( F (1, 40) = 1.575, p = .057, η p 2 = .088); see Figs 2 and 3 .

also in 8,237 other papers

Likewise, the ANCOVA for the Verbal subtask yielded a similar pattern of results as the ANOVA presented above for this subtask, namely only a borderline significant interaction between Real/Novel and Delay ( F (1, 39) = 3.833, p = .057, η p 2 = .089), with no other significant effects ( p s > .1).

also in 11,409 other papers

Additionally, the effect of Group (again, collapsed over both Delay periods) showed a trend for Real objects, with somewhat better performance by the TD than the SLI group ( F (1, 40) = 2.947, p = .094, η p 2 = .069), while it there was no group difference for Novel objects, F (1, 40) = .256, p = .616, η p 2 = .006.

also in 53,322 other papers