approached significancep = 0.06
In the case of learning slope, the contribution of STAI-S total score (entered in the first block) approached significance (β = −0.27, p = 0.06).
In the case of learning slope, the contribution of STAI-S total score (entered in the first block) approached significance (β = −0.27, p = 0.06).
The number of random responses was influenced by age (β = 0.36, p = 0.001) and there was a near-significant effect for the age × pain interaction term (β = 0.20, p = 0.06, Table 4 ).
Furthermore, no significant predictors of percentage retention were identified (though the effect of age was close to significance: β = −0.21, p = 0.08).
This interaction effect was approaching significance in the case of “false alarm” reaction time (β = 0.21, p = 0.08), though the overall model was not significant.