Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study.

Sci Rep · 2020 · PMC7136234 · PMID 32249786

3
hedged sentences
0.0520
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0520
boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach statistical significancep = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In subgroup analyses, we again observed a larger treatment effect estimate in patients with no previous history of CVDD, pooled aHR = 1.60 (95% CI; 1.19, 2.14), compared to patients with CVDD history, pooled aHR = 1.16 (95% CI; 1.03, 1.32), but interaction analyses failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.052, Table 5 ).

also in 6,035 other papers

For both individual substances, results suggested a lower hazard for generic medicines, however, results did not reach statistical significance for simvastatin (C10AA01).

also in 111,027 other papers

nominally significantno p-value reported
Nominally significant treatment effect modification was detected for age (interaction p-value 0.042), with the estimated treatment effects being stronger in patients aged 70 years or younger, aHR 1.20 (95% CI; 1.13, 1.28) than in relatively older patients, aHR 1.10 (95% CI; 1.04, 1.17), and for history of CVDD (interaction p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

also in 7,732 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.