Different ways to forget: Electrophysiological mechanisms underlying item-method directed forgetting of angry and neutral faces.

Front Behav Neurosci · 2022 · PMC9519987 · PMID 36187380

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0540

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

close-to-significantp = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was, however, a close-to-significant correlation between ( r = 0.39, p = 0.054) between the directed forgetting effect for angry faces (hits remember – hits forget) and F-cue evoked potentially relevant late frontal ERP positivity following angry faces.

also in 171 other papers

approached significancep > 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

None of the other pairwise comparisons approached significance ( p > 0.1, Bonferroni-Holm corrected).

also in 8,237 other papers

not clearly significantno p-value reported

(2012) who reported a larger N2 elicited by F-cues following negative pictures, but since this effect was not clearly significant, we refrain from further interpretation.

also in 47 other papers

clearly significantno p-value reported

Relationship between behavior and ERP data As in previous reports ( Hauswald et al., 2011 ; Schindler and Kissler, 2018 ; Alfonso and Menor, 2021 ), we correlated the magnitude of the directed forgetting effect (remember minus forget) with the respective ERP amplitudes during face and cue processing, but failed to find a clearly significant effect.

also in 627 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.