“close-to-significant”

In addition, considering the impact of dental hygiene in athletes on the microbial load, we observe a close-to-significant positive association between brushing once per day and Lactobacillus species ( R -0.94, p = 0.05) and brushing twice per day on the ratio of S. mutans to Lactobacillus spp ( R = 0.82) ( Figure 2c ).

Only close-to-significant differences were found in the annual detection frequencies of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Streptococcus agalactiae ( p = 0.05227 and p = 0.1541), and there was no change in the frequencies of S. aureus ( p = 0.541) or S. bovis ( p = 0.503). 2.3.

The highest predictive capacity was found for PROFUND at 3 months (95%CI: 0.526–0.756; p = 0.016), for PROFUND and NECPAL at 12 months (non-significant; AUC > 0.5), and NECPAL at 24 months (close-to-significant (AUC = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.499–0.750; p = 0.053).

With regard to the changes in SFCT, children in the PNM group exhibited close-to-significant SFCT thickening in G0 ( P = 0.055) and significant thickening in G1 and G7 (both P < 0.001).

Extinction phase (day 1): The ATS revealed a close-to-significant main effect of Trial ( p = 0.056), which can be attributed to the initial fear extinction training trials eliciting a higher response.

, GAN or DDPM, reached a close-to-significant influence on modeling the SSIM ( p = 0.059), and a significant one for modeling MSE, PSNR, and LPIPS.

Across seven resilience factors, there was evidence for small favorable effects, SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [0.21, 0.41], with substantial heterogeneity, Q (63) = 229.66, p <0.001, which mostly derived from between-study differences, while between-outcome differences accounted for a close-to-significant small proportion of heterogeneity, QM (6) = 2.13, p = 0.066.

The observed inverse regulation of CD74 and CXCR4 upon activation was further confirmed by analyses revealing a close-to-significant positive correlation between CXCR4 and the naive T-cell marker CD45RA (r = 0.6329, P = 0.0673) and a significant negative correlation between CD74 and the naive cell marker CD45RA (r = − 0.8005, P = 0.0170) (Fig. 1 G, H).

This difference was not statistically significant, although it was close-to-significant ( p = 0.068) (Table 5 ).

Two-way ANOVA also showed a close-to-significant effect of two compounds: 8-OH-DPAT ( F (1,2) = 3.89, p = 0.07) and 25CN-NBOH ( F (1,2) = 3.66, p = 0.07).

This effect is notably amplified by olaparib, with significantly elevated γH2AX levels as demonstrated by Western blot and flow cytometry, further supported by close-to-significant immunofluorescence analyses ( p = 0.07).

The post-hoc ANCOVAs revealed a close-to-significant improvement in the ‘HAMMAM’ group in the PPT at the left metacarpal point (0.48 [−0.08, 1.04], p = 0.089) ( Table S2 ).

In addition, a higher close-to-significant expression of DUSP6 ( p -value = 0.092) was observed in patients with stages III/IV ( Supplementary Table S4 ).

No significant differences were observed between before and after treatment in the control group, whereas the experimental (surgery) group showed a significant difference between evaluations in the pain VAS score ( p < 0.009) and Newcastle measure ( p < 0.05), with a close-to-significant difference in carer burden score ( p = 0.093).

Moreover, an inverse close-to-significant association was observed between DUSP6 gene expression and concentrations of β-HCH and ΣOCPs (Spearman rho = −0.308, p -value = 0.098; Spearman rho = −0.307, p -value = 0.098, respectively).

When significant or close-to-significant (i.e., p < 0.10, considering that a large effect of a single subcomponent could have been masked by small or null effects in other subcomponents) differences emerged between the two groups of children (responders and non-responders) at the pre-test on a global score; the scores of the components involved in it were analyzed with a multivariate analysis of variance to better characterize the difference (overall multivariate effect and single effects, with alpha = 0.05, two-tailed).

These results showed significant ( p < 0.001) increases or close-to-significant ( p < 0.1) increases ( Figure 4 A,B) in the Phe contents in the two transgenic Arabidopsis lineages.

This approach was further supported by significant or close-to-significant variances of intercepts and slopes in all models, except for the variance of slopes for moderate-stable trajectories of psychopathological symptoms ( p = 0.313) and rumination ( p = 0.462).

In contrast, a close-to-significant correlation was observed between the number of kilometers driven per year and the number of infractions in the more demanding scenario and overall (SDC1: r = −0.178, p = .153; SDC2: r = −0.226, p = .068; Overall: r = −0.221, p = .075).

On the other hand, a visual inspection of the forest plot presented in Figure 3(d) reveals that two of these three IPPs whose pooled effects were calculated using multiple estimations (IPP 2 = 4 studies; IPP 3 = 3 studies) and extensive cohorts of athletes (>4000 participants) were the ones that showed statistically significant or close-to-significant knee injury risk mitigation effects.

For adult populations, our meta-analyses showed a close-to-significant favorable effect for mental distress, M(SMD)=0.33, 95% CI [–0.03, 0.69], which was significant when analyses were limited to high-quality studies.

For adult populations, our meta-analyses showed a close-to-significant favourable effect for mental symptoms, M (SMD) = 0.33, 95% CI [–0.03, 0.69], which was significant when analyses were limited to high-quality studies and larger for clinical compared to non-clinical populations.

Additionally, in the present study, there is no significant or close-to-significant correlation between behavioral interference and the LPP/Alpha ERD (neither regarding the absolute values nor for the emotional vs. neutral differentials).

Generally, we found significant or close-to-significant associations of Gf with mathematics achievement and reading comprehension after controlling for gender.

This close-to-significant difference was probably due to the higher proportion of alpha blocker treatment, a major risk factor for IFIS, in the study group, as mentioned [ 26 ].